|
2010-02-26
, 18:59
|
Posts: 1,283 |
Thanked: 370 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ South Florida
|
#862
|
I bring good news!
I took my (2 week old!) N900 into the my local Nokia service centre and they said they could do it right there in 30 minutes, depending on how broken it is. Mine turned out to be more broken than they could do, so it will have to go back to Nokia, but it's freepost and you literally fill out the form.
Apparently it was on a Nokia bulletin in the last few days.
I asked about recalls and if anything is going to be done to stop this happening again and they said Nokia isn't just replacing that part. Apparently they've supplied a better designed connector which is being fitted instead.
I'm not totally sure what needs to be not broken for the service centres to fix it.
As annoying as it is having to send it away, I'm quite relieved that I'm not having to fight them as some people seem to.
|
2010-02-26
, 19:34
|
Posts: 1,729 |
Thanked: 388 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Canada
|
#863
|
Although my phone is 03/2010, I think they're all the same.
See, a much more reasonable explanation of the situation (rather than assuming Nokia made some changes that cannot be determined with the naked eye) is that Nokia did not change anything at all except their press releases. Not unlike Toyota removing floor mats I suppose.
I want to see pictures of new units that either use through mounted USB ports (highly unlikely since it requires a motherboard redesign) OR much larger solder pads OR a new plastic casing design that provides support for the USB port. That's when I'll believe Nokia did something about it.
Improving the technique for surface mounting the USB port won't help one bit if somehow the USB cable gets snagged and pulls sideways or downwards, or if the user tries to insert it upside down or is simply a butter fingers that cannot correctly align it with the port.
|
2010-02-26
, 19:50
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ anchorage, ak
|
#864
|
|
2010-02-26
, 20:45
|
|
Posts: 270 |
Thanked: 170 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Atlanta, GA + Oxford UK
|
#865
|
|
2010-02-26
, 21:29
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#866
|
Coming from yourself. This is an interesting comment.
I know you have always understood the feelings. But seeing you state it that directly is ... interesting.
|
2010-02-26
, 22:44
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#867
|
|
2010-02-26
, 23:04
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ anchorage, ak
|
#868
|
The Following User Says Thank You to joa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-27
, 01:53
|
|
Posts: 1,310 |
Thanked: 820 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Irving, TX
|
#869
|
|
2010-02-27
, 02:12
|
Posts: 90 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Sydney Australia
|
#870
|
Hopefully Nokia can start using new part in their new producs. Even on N900 I do not think it would take serious PWB redesign. At that location close to the board edge I do not think there are much, if any signal tracks that needs to be moved avay from the mounting holes. This shouldn't affect any certification (FCC, CE, ...I think?) either, so it should be pretty quick and painless process. No?
Tags |
bad design, broken, charging, failure, hardware, loose, microusb, microusb port, n900, nokia, part, port, repair, return, surface mount, usb, usb port, warranty |
|
I know you have always understood the feelings. But seeing you state it that directly is ... interesting.