|
2009-04-16
, 12:32
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#82
|
1) So, lots of the folks here are software developers, according to that user survey (which I haven't read, btw). So, that just shows that the device appeals to the needs of software developers, or, as I rather suspect, to the needs of tech users in an information age. Isn't that OK though? What's wrong with supporting the needs of a large group of people?
It wouldn't be a tablet anymore, it would at best be another iphone or some such. That's a crowded market which is just going to get more crowded.
The Following User Says Thank You to krisse For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-16
, 12:55
|
Posts: 609 |
Thanked: 232 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ the end of my rope
|
#83
|
"Fit Width to View" will not be present in Fremantle, so don't bank too much on getting a hardware button for it on associated devices.
|
2009-04-16
, 13:00
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#84
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TA-t3 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-16
, 13:04
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#85
|
Originally Posted by sjgadsby
"Fit Width to View" will not be present in Fremantle,
|
2009-04-16
, 13:10
|
|
Posts: 2,535 |
Thanked: 6,681 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#86
|
How many tablets have Nokia sold over the past four years? Nokia won't say, and it's the only product line where they won't say.
[...]
Four years is a heck of a long time to go without significant sales, it can't go on forever. There has to be some hit product featuring maemo in order to justify all that time and money spent on it.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-16
, 13:27
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#87
|
Sooner or later their shareholders are going to want to see a return on four years of loss-making investment.
Four years is a heck of a long time to go without significant sales, it can't go on forever. There has to be some hit product featuring maemo in order to justify all that time and money spent on it.
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-04-16
, 13:40
|
|
Posts: 3,105 |
Thanked: 11,088 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Mountain View (CA, USA)
|
#88
|
|
2009-04-16
, 20:50
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#89
|
Skipping the question of whether the Internet Tablets have seen "significant" sales as we don't know the sales numbers or targets, we've been told since September that Nokia will soon position Maemo devices at the top of their product line, pushing S60 devices down to mid-level. The continued, and even increased, hiring for Maemo during a recession that has forced Nokia to cut jobs in other areas only reinforces the importance of the platform to the company. This is further bolstered by signs that Nokia is preparing to have at least two Maemo 5 devices on the market simultaneously, presumably targeting different market segments.
You may have judged Maemo's success prematurely.
... the 5800 and other new feature-rich products helped the company boost its share in smartphones to 38% from 36% the previous quarter, according to market watcher Strategy Analytics.
The gain suggests that Nokia can continue to retake market share as it launches more new smartphones, such as the top-of-the-line touchscreen N97 due out in June. "Nokia is very good at moving features from the high end to the midrange and low end," says Mark McKechnie...
|
2009-04-17
, 02:32
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#90
|
As for the target group of the tablets.. ok, here goes:
1) So, lots of the folks here are software developers, according to that user survey (which I haven't read, btw). So, that just shows that the device appeals to the needs of software developers, or, as I rather suspect, to the needs of tech users in an information age. Isn't that OK though? What's wrong with supporting the needs of a large group of people? Maybe we're not the biggest demographic group in the world, but if everything on the market should be specifically made for (and only for) the largest majority then it would be a sad world. It would IMO be wrong if tablets were to be transformed to just yet another entertainment device with some minimal networking capabilities. It wouldn't be a tablet anymore, it would at best be another iphone or some such. That's a crowded market which is just going to get more crowded.
2) Instead, why not make the device an even more attractive option for "our" group? The market is large, even though it's of course not even a fraction of the mega-market of a mobile phone. Where I work there are more folks than just me that owns a tablet, but we're still just about 4-5% of the potential market just in this building. We have networking/information age needs (and that mostly doesn't really include entertainment needs).
3) As a software developer, and all-around tech person, I_still_ enjoyed Krisse's tablet school articles. Many of them were useful for me, also with my background. For one thing it got me up to speed on some of the things much faster, because the articles neatly laid out the parts involved so that I could see the underlying elements right away. (And the articles were beatifully written and a joy to read too.)
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.