![]() |
2010-09-22
, 09:00
|
Posts: 992 |
Thanked: 738 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Low Earth Orbit
|
#81
|
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 09:27
|
|
Posts: 968 |
Thanked: 663 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Australia (Melbourne/vic) / Lebanon (Zgharta/north)
|
#82
|
The Following User Says Thank You to elie-7 For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 10:16
|
|
Posts: 1,038 |
Thanked: 1,408 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ London
|
#83
|
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 10:27
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 134 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Europe
|
#84
|
Notice who makes all the money - the vast bulk of profits in the "PC industry" are made by MS. Whilst hardware increases in capability and plummets in price month after month, the cost of DOS/Windows keeps going up with each bug fix release. HP gets a huge chunk of its profits from selling ink, its printers/imaging division accounts for over 40% of its net profit for 2009. That is why Dell has got into the lucrative ink market by selling its own printers. Whilst hardware has long been commoditised and thus offer little to negative profits, MS through its ruthless interoperability (read, lack of) has managed to avoid commoditising Windows and hence makes as much or more profit than the rest of the PC industry combined.
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 11:07
|
Posts: 2,802 |
Thanked: 4,491 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#85
|
Whilst hardware has long been commoditised and thus offer little to negative profits
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 11:11
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#86
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ysss For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 15:38
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#87
|
Now, on the OS side there's not going to be a MS this time around. Android has already commoditised the market significantly and Nokia is in the process of doing exactly the same with both Symbian and MeeGo.
Why would they do that? Because the money now is in services (app stores, music stores, ads, LBS etc), and in order for them to be successful there they a) need to be on as many devices as possible (even if they didn't make them), and b) can't let anyone else (eg Google or Apple) corner the market.
Android has no place in that business model (unless you're Google of course). What does, for Nokia, is lots and lots of flashy "Ovi devices" of all flavours designed primarily to make you "consume" "content".
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 17:14
|
|
Posts: 3,159 |
Thanked: 2,023 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Finland
|
#88
|
![]() |
2010-09-22
, 22:21
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#90
|
you have pretty bad spatial sense or then you think badly deformed heads are normal ones.
The Following User Says Thank You to danramos For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
Tags |
back it up sam, chair-throwing, change me, nokia's-balmer, show proof, trolling, video stream, we need diapers |
|