|
2011-02-11
, 11:20
|
Posts: 519 |
Thanked: 366 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ North Carolina (Formerly Denmark and Iceland)
|
#912
|
watched the nokia press live broadcast, and elop said they will still release a meego device before year end, but then said something to the effect of 'well.. after that then we'll see.' he mumbled something about the meego device being an experiment from which they might learn something, or not.
|
2011-02-11
, 11:23
|
Posts: 5 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on May 2010
@ Glasgow
|
#913
|
|
2011-02-11
, 11:25
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Toronto, Canada
|
#914
|
|
2011-02-11
, 11:29
|
|
Posts: 383 |
Thanked: 209 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ London UK
|
#915
|
|
2011-02-11
, 11:32
|
Posts: 1,680 |
Thanked: 3,685 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
|
#916
|
|
2011-02-11
, 11:33
|
Posts: 47 |
Thanked: 19 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#917
|
|
2011-02-11
, 11:35
|
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 368 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#918
|
|
2011-02-11
, 11:36
|
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#919
|
Vic Gundotra of Google tipped off the world two days in advance that on Feb 11 Android would play no part in Nokia’s strategy. To be sure, Elop said that Nokia didn’t choose Android because of “differentiation challenges and commoditization risk” (begging the question of how these challenges and risks are mitigated by licensing another openly available OS).
But I won’t weigh the merits of one module vs. another. Rather, the more pertinent discussion should be on why license instead of build. Clearly, Nokia threw in the towel. Not because they could not build, but because their building processes could not create greatness.
But can greatness ever come from modularity? I’ve argued that it can’t. I’ll maintain that argument as long as what is being built is not good enough. In other words, as long as innovation remains relevant, improvements will be absorbed and rewarded. Once innovation exceeds what can be absorbed, the basis of competition will shift to convenience and price which are best served with a modular business architecture.
Android is a fast follower. The first Android prototypes looked like Blackberries because that was the input paradigm of 2006. When capacitive touch was shown to be a better input method, Android reacted swiftly. When app stores created a new medium Android reacted swiftly. When the iPad demonstrated that computing can be done in new settings, Android reacted. At such time when there will be nothing to follow Android will be the king of the last commoditized innovation, but as long as there is something worth inventing Android will be there to reproduce it.
This is not a judgement, but an observation: Nokia and Microsoft may not make an Apple but neither will Android ever create the future.
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hintry For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-02-11
, 11:37
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#920
|
Tags |
bye-nokia, i don't even, just shoot him, just shoot me, let's elope, lockdown, meego?fail, negatron dan, nokia defiled, nokia suicide, sell tulips, step 8 out of 5, the-end?, www.elop.org |
|
Along comes W7, heir apparent to winmo 6.5 but in terms of features it's actually worse than 6.5? Awesome.
There's currently a battle between iFags and Android fanboys, where the iFags are just about everyone and Android is bought by people who need to feel just a bit more tech savvy than everybody else. That's all fine - but where is W7 really supposed to fit in? It's like iOS in terms of the ball-and-chain, but it doesn't have any of the consumer appeal that Apple products continuously enjoy.