Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#951
Originally Posted by tso View Post
hz is a marketing meme...
I disagree with that statement as it stands, but it's accurate in that the frequency isn't a true indication of resulting speeds. Just the same, the intention here is to satisfy the need for a system that can perform faster than what we're seeing now and 400MHz on the ARM in the N8x0 series are appearing to perform at roughly about what you'd expect for 400MHz.. so I'd like to see that speed increase enough to be able to process things in realtime a little better (video/audio processing on the current processor are a bit woeful... but the DSP might help with this. Question: is the DSP fully integrated to all the video, audio, memory and CPU systems and does everyone have adequate information to be able to take full advantage? I'm asking since I don't know--but if I'm not mistaken it's a "no" all-around thanks to a lot of the closed-source mentality from the hardware end of things.)
 
allnameswereout's Avatar
Posts: 3,397 | Thanked: 1,212 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Netherlands
#952
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
You may want to take a look at this which i compiled a while ago.

http://www.internettablettalk.com/fo...318#post173318
Thanks for the link!! It is a start, but it doesn't include any numbers of how often something was proposed or who proposed, or any pros/cons. Do you still have the data you used to compile your list?
__________________
Goosfraba! All text written by allnameswereout is public domain unless stated otherwise. Thank you for sharing your output!
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#953
Originally Posted by allnameswereout View Post
Do you still have the data you used to compile your list?
I do believe you're posting in it.
__________________
maemo.org profile
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#954
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
The OMAP3430, actually. The OMAP3440 is 800MHz (versus the OMAP3430's 600MHz) and is quite a bit more power-hungry than the OMAP3430, which would result in severely reduced battery life for devices in the tablet's form-factor. The OMAP3440 is really a UMPC chip.

Note: for anybody wondering, OMAP3 is significantly more powerful than OMAP2, so a direct megahertz-to-megahertz comparison (i.e., the OMAP2420's 400MHz versus the OMAP3430's 600MHz) doesn't tell the whole story.
Ohho... OMAP3430 would be VERY good. I'm satisfied with that. (Agreed on the MHz discussion.. but it's still relevant on some level--I don't see anynoe discussing bogomips or any other measurement.. although maybe we should).
 
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#955
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
Whatever for?
speed, X86
going from 400mhz, to 1.6ghz would be incredible
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#956
Originally Posted by bobloadmire View Post
speed, X86
going from 400mhz, to 1.6ghz would be incredible
HAH! I called it.
 
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#957
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
HAH! I called it.
you're not a big fan of speed?

Its not like the atom would kill the battery life. 0.65 watts? Other tablets have it.
and x86 would rock, you could put vista or OS X on there if you wanted.

although probably wouldn't want to.

Last edited by bobloadmire; 2008-08-04 at 18:04.
 
penguinbait's Avatar
Posts: 3,096 | Thanked: 1,525 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Michigan, USA
#958
Should have 1024x600 and more RAM and be available by Thanksgiving.

Faster CPU would be a bonus too
__________________
To all my Maemo friends. I will no longer be monitoring any of my threads here on a regular basis. I am no longer supporting anything I did under maemo at maemo.org. If you need some help with something you can reach me at tablethacker.com or www.facebook.com/penguinbait. I have disabled my PM's here, and removed myself from Council email and Community mailing list. There has been some fun times, see you around.
 
Posts: 5,335 | Thanked: 8,187 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Pennsylvania, USA
#959
Originally Posted by bobloadmire View Post
Its not like the atom would kill the battery life. 0.65 watts? Other tablets have it.
With battery life equal to the Internet Tablets?

EDIT: Ah, you slipped the "0.65 watts" in there. Please see this previous discussion on Atom vs OMAP power consumption.
__________________
maemo.org profile

Last edited by sjgadsby; 2008-08-04 at 18:10. Reason: Adding link to previous power consumption discussion
 

The Following User Says Thank You to sjgadsby For This Useful Post:
Posts: 87 | Thanked: 5 times | Joined on Jan 2008
#960
Originally Posted by sjgadsby View Post
With battery life equal to the Internet Tablets?

EDIT: Ah, you slipped the "0.65 watts" in there. Please see this previous discussion on Atom vs OMAP power consumption.
do the atoms not suspened like the OMAP processors do?
 
Reply

Tags
dpads are fun, ideas, n900, n900 wishlist, revenge of the styli, stuff for nokia to read, the wrath of sty, wishlist


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:53.