|
2010-07-16
, 20:12
|
Posts: 144 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#952
|
|
2010-07-16
, 21:53
|
Posts: 474 |
Thanked: 283 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Oxford, UK
|
#953
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jjx For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-17
, 01:09
|
|
Posts: 549 |
Thanked: 299 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
@ Australian in the Philippines
|
#954
|
http://www.arm.com/community/softwar...ment/adobe.php
Isn't this a promise in itself? I am not talking about the video we all have seen that a gazillion times.
The Following User Says Thank You to dchky For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-18
, 09:36
|
Posts: 107 |
Thanked: 28 times |
Joined on Jun 2010
|
#957
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cmsjkung For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-20
, 10:53
|
Posts: 958 |
Thanked: 483 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#958
|
The Following User Says Thank You to droll For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-07-20
, 12:35
|
|
Posts: 876 |
Thanked: 396 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#960
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bec For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
adobe, adobe flash, blahblah, flash, flash 10, flash 10.1, fremantle, future, idiotic thread, maemo, maemo 5, nokia, nokia fails, update |
|
Isn't this a promise in itself? I am not talking about the video we all have seen that a gazillion times.
This to my understanding is a damn promise not kept well:
"ARM powered devices with Flash Player 10.1 will ship 1H 2010."
This can however be perceived any which way.. either new ARM devices will "ship" with FP 10.1 or existing devices getting 10.1.
and this sounded like we certainly would have FP 10.1 for N900:
"ARM and its silicon Partners have been working closely with Adobe to deliver Flash Player 10.1 on the latest ARM Cortex-A processors"
I frankly hate playing the blame game. It's pointless but someone has to take the blame. I have lost hope anyways.