Active Topics

 


Poll: Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!
Poll Options
Do you think its possible to overclock the N900?!

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 78 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#981
If default clock speed = 600Mhz, and for certain process, it takes up constant 100% usage over a period of say 10s?

VS

clock speed = 900Mhz, and for similar process, it takes up constant 100% usage over a period of say 3s?

Base on above, does it mean OC is better?

On another hand, if running apps like PSX4ALL over long periods say 1hr, the impact/damage will be on 900Mhz?
 
xgrind's Avatar
Posts: 51 | Thanked: 8 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#982
Can't wait to see a good show I reckon?

Originally Posted by Rushmore View Post

BTW, I hope nobody has a fried N900 due to OC, but I look forward to the post and Bratag's reply to them
 
Posts: 1,255 | Thanked: 393 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ US
#983
Originally Posted by xgrind View Post
Can't wait to see a good show I reckon?

Just need some popcorn and a bubbly beverage
 
NokiaRocks's Avatar
Posts: 658 | Thanked: 117 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#984
Originally Posted by filologen View Post
It seems that most people after flashing one of the overclocked kernels onto the device gets "Version: Unknown" listed in "About the product". This is however not the case for me (I use the 900ghz image), and I wonder if this could be due to me using fiasco-flasher on the device instead of the Flasher-3.5.

Not important, but just a little bit interesting.
I want that 900ghz image tho
 
Posts: 78 | Thanked: 30 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#985
Originally Posted by NokiaRocks View Post
I want that 900ghz image tho
Darn! 900Ghz
Say goodbye to PC, Servers, etc
 
debernardis's Avatar
Posts: 2,142 | Thanked: 2,054 times | Joined on Dec 2006 @ Sicily
#986
Originally Posted by filologen View Post
It seems that most people after flashing one of the overclocked kernels onto the device gets "Version: Unknown" listed in "About the product". This is however not the case for me (I use the 900ghz image), and I wonder if this could be due to me using fiasco-flasher on the device instead of the Flasher-3.5.

Not important, but just a little bit interesting.
Nope, I used the device fiasco-flasher and got the version turned to unknown.
__________________
Ernesto de Bernardis

 

The Following User Says Thank You to debernardis For This Useful Post:
Posts: 12 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Little Rock
#987
The uncertainties of the undecided .., should be in another thread ..!

and reserve this thread only for technical matters of who we encourage you to take the plunge .. into the unknown ....(the dangerous overclocking)...
 
Posts: 151 | Thanked: 82 times | Joined on Sep 2008
#988
Originally Posted by Bratag View Post
I flashed - checked it and went back to stock.
Exactly how did you go back to stock? Did you have to do a full reflash or did you just replace the kernel.?

Which kernel file did you use and do you have the original info at ( System: Settings: About Product ) restored?

i
 
Ronaldo's Avatar
Posts: 682 | Thanked: 208 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ UK
#989
Originally Posted by debernardis View Post
Nope, I used the device fiasco-flasher and got the version turned to unknown.
maybe its the image that was modified.
__________________
n900 (UK) Global 3.2010.02.8
 
Posts: 170 | Thanked: 27 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ reading, uk
#990
Hey i tried 800 and 900 but couldnt really see any difference so gone back to 600 just in case. Thanks anyway though.

it seems slower now must of been faster then.

Last edited by torres76; 2010-04-05 at 17:01.
 
Reply

Tags
cooking on gas, cortex-a8, faster, first to fry it wins!, hardware, its smoking, n900, need for speed, need for weed, nos, omap, omap3, omap3430, overclock, overclocking, soc, system-on-a-chip, the dogs, this thread got good!, vtec just kicked in y0!, warranty will be void, whooplah, zoom zoom


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:50.