The Following User Says Thank You to edbanger For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-19
, 08:34
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 2,622 |
Thanked: 5,447 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#982
|
btw. to end user it doesn?t matter :| Speed is king no matter how it is played behind curtains. Only people who are really interested are people hanging around here :|
IMO it should not take more than 3 secs and should not halt whole OS while doing these heavy I/O operations.
|
2011-05-19
, 08:39
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#983
|
Ok, I'm not totally awake yet, so please correct me if my logic is off, but if i take the word clock from the n900 screen, it's 38 pixels wide. This means it fits 12.6315789 times on a 480px screen.
When i then measure the width of the n950 screen on the screencap, and take the black borders in account, i get something like 1120px wide, and 76px for the word Clock, meaning that it would fit 14.73 times on that screen.
Multiplying 38px with 14.7368421 gives me 560px, so I'm leaning more to qHD, and thus 960*540.
The Following User Says Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-19
, 08:40
|
|
Posts: 1,111 |
Thanked: 1,985 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Åbo, Finland
|
#984
|
Ok, I'm not totally awake yet, so please correct me if my logic is off, but if i take the word clock from the n900 screen, it's 38 pixels wide. This means it fits 12.6315789 times on a 480px screen.
When i then measure the width of the n950 screen on the screencap, and take the black borders in account, i get something like 1120px wide, and 76px for the word Clock, meaning that it would fit 14.73 times on that screen.
Multiplying 38px with 14.7368421 gives me 560px, so I'm leaning more to qHD, and thus 960*540.
The Following User Says Thank You to mece For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-19
, 08:48
|
Posts: 46 |
Thanked: 34 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#985
|
you're assuming that the resolution of the font is the same on both devices. that wouldn't make sense on a higher resolution device because the pixel density have to aument to remain with the same icon/font-size.
The Following User Says Thank You to edbanger For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-19
, 08:49
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#986
|
|
2011-05-19
, 08:53
|
|
Posts: 1,259 |
Thanked: 1,341 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Germany
|
#987
|
I don't know him, but let's face it: 800x480 was used by Nokia since 2005 - 2006 (Nokia 770).
A display resolution upgrade would make sense.
|
2011-05-19
, 08:56
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#988
|
a 1024x768px resolution would be nice, even a 560p would be nice. I had the problem that some dialogs at gimp where to height for the 480p N900 screen. So, with a 560p or 768p screen would Gimp work a lot better!
But sadly it will most likely get a capacitive screen. And without this accuracy and without pen Gimp will stop working for me.
Again... [sigh]
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-05-19
, 09:02
|
|
Posts: 1,111 |
Thanked: 1,985 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Åbo, Finland
|
#989
|
|
2011-05-19
, 09:06
|
|
Posts: 2,361 |
Thanked: 3,746 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Berlin - Love this city!!
|
#990
|
Anyone have a large enough monitor to get an actual 1080p screencap? These pictures are not full size...
The Following User Says Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post: | ||
Tags |
duke nukem4eva, epic!, harmattan, n-950, nokia diamond, non-believers, rm680, wasteland |
|
When i then measure the width of the n950 screen on the screencap, and take the black borders in account, i get something like 1120px wide, and 76px for the word Clock, meaning that it would fit 14.73 times on that screen.
Multiplying 38px with 14.7368421 gives me 560px, so I'm leaning more to qHD, and thus 960*540.