|
2010-12-15
, 13:09
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#2
|
|
2010-12-15
, 13:23
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#3
|
|
2010-12-15
, 13:36
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#4
|
|
2010-12-15
, 13:44
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#5
|
|
2010-12-15
, 13:51
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#6
|
|
2010-12-15
, 14:07
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#7
|
|
2010-12-15
, 14:20
|
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 57 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Netherlands
|
#8
|
|
2010-12-15
, 15:14
|
|
Posts: 635 |
Thanked: 282 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Black Mesa Research Facility
|
#9
|
|
2010-12-15
, 15:30
|
Posts: 214 |
Thanked: 256 times |
Joined on May 2010
|
#10
|
In my opinion, this isn't correct.
The N900 has a max resolution of 800 X 450. This is in the 16:9 ratio, so why encode to 800 X 448? Why not use 800 X 450?
I've tried making a new image in photoshop with 1280 X 720, then i resized it to make the width 800, keeping the original aspact ratio. The height output was 480.
Am I wrong, or is the wiki wrong?
Last edited by Maharadja; 2010-12-15 at 12:43. Reason: Typo in title