|
2009-01-02
, 10:10
|
Posts: 31 |
Thanked: 20 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
@ Ohio
|
#2
|
To sum up - don't You think that top placed bars in applications (especially in fullscreen) are more comfortable than bottom ones?
|
2009-01-02
, 10:31
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#3
|
|
2009-01-02
, 10:33
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Poland / Bialystok
|
#4
|
I always find top placed bars in applications (even in full screen) undesirable on a touch-interface device.
Top-placed menus might be familiar from my exposure to desktop applications, but they do not make sense on a touch-screen. It isn't a matter of avoiding touching other controls or of the convenience of using them when placed there, it is the simple fact that my hand obscures the screen when using them.
|
2009-01-02
, 10:36
|
Posts: 226 |
Thanked: 47 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Poland / Bialystok
|
#5
|
funny... right before i came to this site today, i used "mirage". it's a nice image viewing program that can do some simple manipulation such as crop, resize etc.
it has its button bar on top, not on the bottom of the screen, and i never get used to it - i find it most annoying. i find myself using the menu rather than the buttons in this situation.
so when i saw this poll, the answer was easy. bottom!
|
2009-01-02
, 14:13
|
|
Posts: 3,397 |
Thanked: 1,212 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Netherlands
|
#6
|
|
2009-01-02
, 22:17
|
|
Posts: 2,869 |
Thanked: 1,784 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Po' Bo'. PA
|
#7
|
|
2009-01-02
, 22:34
|
|
Posts: 480 |
Thanked: 378 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Chicago-ish
|
#8
|
|
2009-01-03
, 06:04
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#9
|
On the tablet, stuff at the top is undesirable because when using the top of the screen, your hand is blocking most of the screen. Buttons on the bottom allow you to see the screen, and see notifications that the buttons give, while pressing them.
Having said that, all OSes I can think of have some kind of bar at the bottom. Windows has the taskbar at the bottom, OS X has the dock at the bottom, and both KDE and GNOME allow you to switch programs using a bar at the bottom. I realize these are all configurable options, I'm just looking at the default setup here.
|
2009-01-03
, 07:53
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Bay area, CA // Kampala, Uganda
|
#10
|
Tags |
ergonomic, gui, hildon |
|
Let's take Xournal for example.
On PC - it has top placed menu bar, on tablet - bottom.
Why? Just because someone build tablet's browsers that way?
Of course it's more comfortable to work with stylus on the bottom area of the screen but - hey - in fact no one types in browser addres window directly - the keyboard shows up and we "type" - at the bottom of course.
From my point of view the bottom screen's area is too precious to put some fixed bars here - just like almost any app does.
On the other hand - hildon desktop seems free from this issue since it has it's bar on the top.
This is the way we could avoid some silly behaviour when in full-screen mode right scrollbar flickers at the bottom because additional webpage elements are being downloaded.
To sum up - don't You think that top placed bars in applications (especially in fullscreen) are more comfortable than bottom ones?