|
2010-10-06
, 03:55
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#3
|
|
2010-10-06
, 04:00
|
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 69 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
|
#4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Changegames For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-06
, 04:11
|
Posts: 418 |
Thanked: 90 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#5
|
|
2010-10-06
, 04:12
|
Posts: 3,664 |
Thanked: 1,530 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Hamilton, New Zealand
|
#6
|
The Following User Says Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-10-06
, 04:21
|
|
Posts: 105 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Wellington, New Zealand
|
#8
|
|
2010-10-06
, 08:06
|
|
Posts: 271 |
Thanked: 124 times |
Joined on May 2006
@ Aperture Science, Inc.
|
#10
|
Tags |
clueless, worstthreadever |
|
Does anyone else here think that they went the wrong way with the (leaked) Nokia N9 design?
N900 is so beautiful and simple - it's like the ThinkPad of laptops. And the N9 has these completely unnecessary flat-ish sides that look like somebody just went and squished your phone...
SAD. NOT SEXY, NOKIA.
I am sticking to my N900, thank you.