|
2009-05-19
, 15:54
|
|
Posts: 1,540 |
Thanked: 1,045 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#2
|
Some 2.2 million people are going to be buying an awkward monochrome, monopurpose device like the Kindle — this year and next — just so they can feed their reading habit. Think how many would be happy paying their money for a full-color, Flash-capable, pocket-size Internet Tablet. It's got to be a lot, I think.
|
2009-05-19
, 16:44
|
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 82 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Silicon Valley
|
#3
|
It's a fascinating idea, but the comparison somewhat misses the point of the Kindle's screen. Yes it is monochrome, but the reason it costs a fortune is because it uses an e-ink screen which is much easier to read than LCD displays.
Unless the new Maemo devices are as easy to read as e-ink, they won't really be competition for things like the Kindle.
The Following User Says Thank You to speednut For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-05-19
, 17:11
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on May 2009
@ Tampa, FL
|
#4
|
|
2009-05-19
, 18:04
|
|
Posts: 772 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
@ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
|
#5
|
Unless the new Maemo devices are as easy to read as e-ink, they won't really be competition for things like the Kindle.
|
2009-05-19
, 18:33
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#6
|
|
2009-05-20
, 07:50
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#7
|
|
2009-05-20
, 07:58
|
|
Moderator |
Posts: 7,109 |
Thanked: 8,820 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Vancouver, BC, Canada
|
#8
|
|
2009-05-20
, 08:05
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#9
|
Actually, the Maemo screen is vastly superior to the ultra low contrast ridiculously priced e-ink screens.
|
2009-05-20
, 08:31
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#10
|
Wouldn't it be cool to build an e-book reader using a real browser engine like Webkit? If you want to read non-HTML files, simply convert to HTML before rendering.
Last edited by RogerS; 2009-05-19 at 15:39. Reason: Correcting paragraphing