|
2009-10-15
, 06:05
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#2
|
|
2009-10-15
, 06:57
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,541 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#4
|
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-15
, 07:21
|
|
Posts: 2,355 |
Thanked: 5,249 times |
Joined on Jan 2009
@ Barcelona
|
#5
|
|
2009-10-15
, 08:34
|
Posts: 38 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#7
|
|
2009-10-15
, 08:36
|
Posts: 182 |
Thanked: 540 times |
Joined on Aug 2009
@ Finland
|
#8
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to abbra For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-15
, 08:44
|
|
Posts: 266 |
Thanked: 157 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
|
#9
|
Having said that, I see no real reason why it wouldn't only I would not risk my euro $500 device just to test it.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to unkno For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2009-10-15
, 10:02
|
|
Posts: 2,121 |
Thanked: 1,540 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Oxford, UK
|
#10
|
Tags |
bada rulez, expensive brick, here's a quarter, just shoot me, lol @ abill_uk, playinwithballs, poosticks, random stuff, soldering competition, wtb: 1 omap 3630 chip |
|
I have read they have the same package size.
The 3430 is at 65nm and the 3630 is at 45nm.
I also read TI pdf that shows a diagram of them sharing the same architecture.
The pdf is located here: http://www.ti.com/lit/swpt024
Have Fun