azkay
|
2012-11-06
, 04:19
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Brisbane, Australia
|
#1
|
|
2012-11-06
, 05:59
|
|
Posts: 277 |
Thanked: 215 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#4
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ed00 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-11-06
, 06:20
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Brisbane, Australia
|
#5
|
|
2012-11-06
, 06:36
|
Banned |
Posts: 2 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2012
|
#6
|
|
2012-11-06
, 06:59
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#7
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2012-11-06
, 08:22
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Brisbane, Australia
|
#8
|
You do of course realize that the crop factor of the N900 sensor is something around 6, which makes 35mm lenses pretty unusable for any normal photography barring possibly birdwatching?
In other words, if you fit in it a normal objective like Nikkor 50mm/1.8 you get equivalent FOV of 300mm.
|
2012-11-06
, 09:08
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#9
|
|
2012-11-06
, 09:13
|
Posts: 395 |
Thanked: 509 times |
Joined on Jan 2011
@ Brisbane, Australia
|
#10
|
One question - why not use a real Nikon lens mount? I took a look at my D90, and its mount looks about the same size or slightly larger than the N900.
If I didn't have a CNC machine to print out a full back cover I'd salvage a real mount off an old AF-S body. That way, you get the real feel and "click" of the mount.