The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to joerg_rw For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-05-02
, 20:38
|
Posts: 158 |
Thanked: 340 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ middle of nowhere
|
#2
|
|
2014-05-03
, 03:07
|
|
Posts: 1,974 |
Thanked: 1,834 times |
Joined on Mar 2013
@ india
|
#3
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to nokiabot For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-05-03
, 05:15
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#4
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-05-03
, 21:06
|
Posts: 158 |
Thanked: 340 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ middle of nowhere
|
#5
|
As for removing module from mainboard - I found that every case I know about (including my own ones) when *removed* module ends up with broken focus (can focus only 'till some random close distance, like 15 centimeter or a meter, but not further away), involve using *metallic* things to remove module - like, broken shaving blade. Even if done *really* carefully, without any possible physical damage to module.
OTOH, when using *plastic* or other non-conductive, thin things to disable module locks, I got 100% success rate. I speculated about something getting broken due to magnets inside module interacting with metallic things, but I have no idea how it is possible. AFAIK - from post-mortem section of broken module - camera have fixed magnets in "case", and coil around part with lens, that is pushed away via little springs - calibrated current in coil created magnetic field that interacts with fixed magnets, and position lens where it should be.
I don't know how working on mobo without battery (=lens coil powered down?) inn could damage/destroy calibration of said lens and its coil But, statistic - while often lying - is damn useful, so I switched to plastic makeshift removal tools, and haven't had any problems with camera modules, since.
/Estel
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ryu1 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-05-04
, 18:32
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#6
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-05-04
, 20:49
|
Posts: 158 |
Thanked: 340 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ middle of nowhere
|
#7
|
|
2014-05-04
, 21:20
|
|
Posts: 2,222 |
Thanked: 12,651 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
@ SOL 3
|
#8
|
@joerg_rw, i read somwhere that the camera modules of nokia 6720, N79, N82, N85, N96 should also work, but i didn't tested any of those. If i'll find some of those phones second-hand, i'll buy and check the module compatibility.
Also what type of tin will be used in neo900? lead-free or the good old one?
|
2014-05-04
, 21:41
|
Posts: 158 |
Thanked: 340 times |
Joined on Jul 2010
@ middle of nowhere
|
#9
|
|
2014-05-05
, 05:55
|
|
Posts: 5,028 |
Thanked: 8,613 times |
Joined on Mar 2011
|
#10
|
Tags |
camera module, nokia n900 |
|
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...19#post1423819 mentions successful replacement of N900 camera by a reworked N97 cam module. Looks like a SMIA95 socket on a flex cable with B2B connector, and a pretty similar looking cam module inserted into this socket
Additional info highly appreciated. Thanks!
/j
Last edited by joerg_rw; 2014-05-02 at 20:07.