The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chrismint For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-19
, 23:07
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#2
|
|
2010-01-19
, 23:08
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#3
|
i'm gutted to have to post this as to start with i absolutely loved the n900's functionality however I've recently come up against a few major issues.
Number one which is a massive problem is battery life. I bought my phone a week or two ago direct from nokia, and i wouldn' class myself as any more than a moderate user. Still, on an average day I can listen to a bit of music on the way into work, and get some usage out of it at work, and thats it. By the time I go home the phone is dead. There is absolutely no excuse or justification for this - its a brand new phone with a brand new battery with a low to moderate use and it can't stay awake as long as me!?
Searching these forums have led me to believe this is due to a wifi fault, however these posts were from last September and the issue clearly still exists. The worst thing is during my initial excitement I persuaded a colleague to get an N900 and his phone performs worst than mine on 100% factory settings.
5his brings me on to my second issue which is the attitude on this site of 'its not a phone its a computer.' I keep seeing this on any thread describing a shortfall with the N900 and its driving me mad because its a load of crap. The Nokia site describes it as a phone, or a mobile phone. To have spent three months saving for it and then to read this kind of comment is a massive piss take. IF THE MANUFACTURER SELLS IT FOR £500 AS A PHONE ITS A PHONE!
As I said at the start of the post its a real shame as the N900 has huge potential, however the hardware I was delivered is only a proof of concept so far, not a product that I could ever justify charging for!
i'd really love to be proven wrong on this as I love what this phone could be, so any advice would be welcome...
|
2010-01-19
, 23:10
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oxford
|
#4
|
|
2010-01-19
, 23:10
|
Posts: 33 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ London, UK
|
#5
|
|
2010-01-19
, 23:12
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#6
|
I've done all the recent updates, and I'm sorry but if I have to turn of functions such as wifi or 3g to get a working day out of it its going straight back to Nokia...
|
2010-01-19
, 23:12
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#7
|
Have you updated the firmware? One of the things that is much improved is battery life. I can get 24 hours off charger with ease (granted, 8 of it I am asleep) with the current firmware.
I suggest you update it. And turn off wifi if you want maximum battery life.
(re battery life, guess you've never used an iPhone 3G, or any phone made by HTC, with sub 8 hour battery life?)
|
2010-01-19
, 23:13
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oxford
|
#8
|
|
2010-01-19
, 23:13
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#9
|
Is that 24hour in 3G with IM constantly connected?
I can get 24hour, but only with at&t edge and IM constantly connected and not using the device very much.
|
2010-01-19
, 23:15
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 26 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Oxford
|
#10
|
Ok, you should return it.
My netbook with a 6 cell battery that weighs about 3x as much as the n900 (just the battery, mind you) gets 6 hours run time with wifi on.
You can leave 3G on, but expecting hours of runtime with wifi on is expecting quite a bit from a 900mah battery.
Number one which is a massive problem is battery life. I bought my phone a week or two ago direct from nokia, and i wouldn' class myself as any more than a moderate user. Still, on an average day I can listen to a bit of music on the way into work, and get some usage out of it at work, and thats it. By the time I go home the phone is dead. There is absolutely no excuse or justification for this - its a brand new phone with a brand new battery with a low to moderate use and it can't stay awake as long as me!?
Searching these forums have led me to believe this is due to a wifi fault, however these posts were from last September and the issue clearly still exists. The worst thing is during my initial excitement I persuaded a colleague to get an N900 and his phone performs worst than mine on 100% factory settings.
5his brings me on to my second issue which is the attitude on this site of 'its not a phone its a computer.' I keep seeing this on any thread describing a shortfall with the N900 and its driving me mad because its a load of crap. The Nokia site describes it as a phone, or a mobile phone. To have spent three months saving for it and then to read this kind of comment is a massive piss take. IF THE MANUFACTURER SELLS IT FOR £500 AS A PHONE ITS A PHONE!
As I said at the start of the post its a real shame as the N900 has huge potential, however the hardware I was delivered is only a proof of concept so far, not a product that I could ever justify charging for!
i'd really love to be proven wrong on this as I love what this phone could be, so any advice would be welcome...