Active Topics
-
The N900 is now 15 years old! (7)
to Nokia N900 by Danct12 - 23 hrs, 34 mins ago -
Sailfish OS for the Motorola Moto G7 Power (XT1955-5) - (ocean) (4)
to SailfishOS by Maemish - 1 day, 19 hrs ago -
F(x)tec Pro1x (QWERTY) for sale (0)
to Buy & Sell by aln00000 - 4 days, 3 hrs ago - more...
 |
|
2009-05-27
, 00:52
|
|
Posts: 772 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
@ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
|
#2
|
Well, as discussed before, Nokia will be issuing a netbook. But as Architengi incisively asks,
Will there be a need for an NIT if pocket internet is capably delivered on a cellphone and Maemo moves to the next bigger-sized device?
Will Maemo OS be used in the new netbook? (most probably, yes — I don't think Symbian OS will go that far).
__________________
N900 Guide Brief intro to the Nokia N900 (http://n900guide.com/)
Maemoan since July 2005 )
N900 Guide Brief intro to the Nokia N900 (http://n900guide.com/)
Maemoan since July 2005 )
|
|
2009-05-27
, 00:58
|
|
Posts: 3,319 |
Thanked: 5,610 times |
Joined on Aug 2008
@ Finland
|
#4
|
Originally Posted by RogerS
As someone pointed out, if it makes sense for Archos to have 4-5-6-7 inch devices, it can make sense for Nokia, too. The gap between a netbook and a phone is certainly large, so the question is 'just' what target audience are they envisioning (IF they are envisioning anything above 3.5").
Well, as discussed before, Nokia will be issuing a netbook. But as Architengi incisively asks,
Will there be a need for an NIT if pocket internet is capably delivered on a cellphone and Maemo moves to the next bigger-sized device?
|
|
2009-05-27
, 01:52
|
|
Posts: 237 |
Thanked: 167 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Powell, OH
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by attila77
Archos revenue was ~ $180M dollar last year, Nokia's ~ $70B. For all we know Nokia could have sold more NIT's than all of Archos' line put together with one device with a 4.1" screen.
As someone pointed out, if it makes sense for Archos to have 4-5-6-7 inch devices, it can make sense for Nokia, too. The gap between a netbook and a phone is certainly large, so the question is 'just' what target audience are they envisioning (IF they are envisioning anything above 3.5").
|
|
2009-05-27
, 02:09
|
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#6
|
Originally Posted by RogerS
Likely yes. I'm one of those individuals who prefer to have two seperate devices then one combined device. I can easily kill the battery on my tablet with usage. I don't want that happening to my phone so I'm screwed when I need it the most.
Well, as discussed before, Nokia will be issuing a netbook. But as Architengi incisively asks,
Will there be a need for an NIT if pocket internet is capably delivered on a cellphone and Maemo moves to the next bigger-sized device?
Not to mention there aren't many phones out there that can do what I want it to do easily. The iPhone requires hacking (only to have said hacks erased with an Apple update). Android (it's getting there). Though both need slightly bigger screens.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss
They're maemo and MeeGo...
"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
| The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-05-27
, 02:12
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#7
|
Originally Posted by theflew
Has anybody really found/stated the real numbers for the NIT sales?
Archos revenue was ~ $180M dollar last year, Nokia's ~ $70B. For all we know Nokia could have sold more NIT's than all of Archos' line put together with one device with a 4.1" screen.
I keep hearing "it's better than you think" or something as vague, but nothing exact.
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2009-05-27
, 03:01
|
|
Posts: 1,213 |
Thanked: 356 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ California and Virginia
|
#8
|
Not the first. The Archos5 has the same resolution, same with some Sony phone. In fact, I believe the new sidekick has a higher res screen! And screen resolution is nothing compared to usability and apps. So unless this is running Symbian or WinMo or Android, why bother.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------
www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.
----------------------------------------------------
www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.
 |
|
2009-05-27
, 05:59
|
|
Posts: 3,404 |
Thanked: 4,474 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ Germany
|
#9
|
Originally Posted by Laughing Man
Yes, as long as battery capacity of smartphones is as poor as today, there's no benefit from cramming all functionality into one device. Yesterday my G1 phone died during the day because some 3rd party app behaved badly and drained battery while running in the background.
Likely yes. I'm one of those individuals who prefer to have two seperate devices then one combined device. I can easily kill the battery on my tablet with usage. I don't want that happening to my phone so I'm screwed when I need it the most.
I think Apple did the right thing when disallowing multitasking for 3rd party apps. Although not having multitasking sucks.
 |
|
2009-05-27
, 09:21
|
|
Posts: 357 |
Thanked: 115 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Sunny England :)
|
#10
|
Originally Posted by RogerS
Yes. I can't walk down the street holding using a netbook, and a phone is (generally) too small to be very useful when browsing the news while lying on the sofa. 4-5" can be the best of both worlds.
Will there be a need for an NIT if pocket internet is capably delivered on a cellphone and Maemo moves to the next bigger-sized device?
__________________
pixel - pushing buttons that shouldn't be pushed, and fiddling with things that shouldn't be fiddled with
pixel - pushing buttons that shouldn't be pushed, and fiddling with things that shouldn't be fiddled with
Last edited by RogerS; 2009-05-27 at 00:38.