![]() |
2007-10-16
, 17:11
|
Posts: 262 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#2
|
![]() |
2007-10-16
, 17:27
|
Posts: 450 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#3
|
![]() |
2007-10-16
, 23:19
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#4
|
![]() |
2007-10-17
, 13:53
|
Posts: 262 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#5
|
i was going to vote for option #4, but seeing how everybody likes them I voted for option #3. they overlap with the items in the scroll area and that looks bad. especially with the right-hand cd-icon on the bigger items. doesn't look good.
my opinion is, they should be thin. really thin. if you can't/don't want to flick your finger to kinetic-scroll, use your fingernail to move the thin scrollbar :P i don't think finger-friendliness is necessary there, just takes too much space no matter what you do.
![]() |
2007-10-17
, 16:53
|
Posts: 450 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#6
|
![]() |
2007-10-17
, 18:13
|
Posts: 262 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#7
|
I prefer the present scroll bar. The thinner one would require a more "precise" placement and use of the stylus. And I like the "boldness" of the new one's appearance, which for me doesn't get in the way of anything vital.
![]() |
2007-10-18
, 10:27
|
Posts: 191 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#8
|
![]() |
2007-10-18
, 12:38
|
Posts: 262 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
|
#9
|
yep trev, i'd like something like that. if it's that's too thin for other users it could be a little more bigger on the handle.
just takes too much space if it's fully thumb friendly. nobody has fingernails now? (also, remember that iphone has to be all-thumb friendly because their touchscreen doesn't work with nails)
The Following User Says Thank You to trevarthan For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2007-10-19
, 12:59
|
Posts: 75 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Aug 2007
|
#10
|
Feel free to make comments and suggestions here regarding the scroll bars. Thanks!