![]() |
2007-11-02
, 21:12
|
Posts: 112 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
|
#2
|
![]() |
2007-11-03
, 12:47
|
|
Posts: 236 |
Thanked: 149 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ Finland
|
#3
|
![]() |
2007-11-03
, 14:05
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#4
|
![]() |
2007-11-03
, 14:34
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#5
|
What a fascinating idea. No more "oh no, why does the N810 have a keyboard instead of an accelerometer" - you just put together the components that are right for you. Or, even better: that are right for you for this one day. And replace the GPS with a camera tomorrow. Whatever. LEGO computing! I'll buy one
(The only thing thats not really clear is how free the platform will be. Saying "open source" means nothing, it has become a marketing buzzword these days. We'll have to look carefully at what they do, if there are any proprietary components etc.)
![]() |
2007-11-03
, 15:23
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#6
|
Well, the marketing drones can buzzword open source as much as they want, it still means that the sources have to be available.
![]() |
2007-11-03
, 16:36
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#7
|
Even with the sources available, it doesnt necessarily mean its free. I remember cases in which the sources were open but the license did not allow you to change the code or propagate the program in any way, changed or unchanged. So it could even be "open source" but have licensing issues.
(This is, btw, one of the reasons I dont like the term "open source" any more. Experience told me that Richard Stallman was right after all: it is better to call it "free software".)
Anyway, its much too early to speculate now. Lets see what they come up with (and lets wait for the price).
At least one thing they did not do, apparently, is starting some kind of developers program, or did they? I would have expected such a project to try and get some community support before launch...
![]() |
2007-11-03
, 17:15
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#8
|
I firmly believe anyone is free to do with their sources as they wish.
If "open" means I can look at it, then that's already better than closed. [...] It's not much, but at least it's something.
Give them some credit: All there is at the moment, is a few prototypes and pictures. Surely, a developer program for a hardware program requires at least a couple of devices?
http://www.golem.de/0711/55803.html (german article about bug)
The bug tries to be Open Source only. Interesting Concept.