Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#1
Hello everyone,

I bought my N800 a week ago and have played around with it for quite a few hours now. It is great to have this forum as a source for background information.

What surprises me most about the device is that it excels at many tasks which it was not designed for and nearly fails the web browsing part (my humble if admittedly slightly exaggerated opinion). I find the browser not much more convenient than Opera Mini on my mobile phone, the difference being that when I use my phone for web browsing it’s usually to get some vital information on the road where the benefit of obtaining that information far outweighs the inconveniences of mobile phone browsing.

The N800, however, was meant for convenient couch surfing. It fails ( IMHO) for the reasons listed below.
If any of the Nokia/MicroB developers read this, please do not be offended. I know it comes across as a bit of a rant but it is mainly the result of exaggerated high hopes which have not been met.

- speed: most web sites load fine but many of those that make heavy use of AJAX are slow to unusable: Yahoo Mail, Google Maps, to name just a few. It is also a pain to watch internettablettalk being loaded in the browser, it takes 20 seconds to load the homepage on my device (OS2008, 128 MB virtual memory allocated). Maybe this is a bug, can’t see what’s so special about the page (apart from its user base, obviously ;-))
- zoom: does not work properly on many web pages, especially google’s. Size of the page will be increased but no scroll bars appear to scroll the missing content into view -> again, maybe this is a bug that will be fixed in the final release
- full screen browsing concept: the display size of the N800 makes full screen browsing almost mandatory. Why then does it have to be so difficult to call up the controls to navigate to a new site. Easiest way to do it would be to offer an “auto-hide” option for the address bar with the same handling as the windows task bar. Or is there a nifty shortcut to address bar and bookmarks that I don’t know anything about? I would be grateful if someone could tell me about that.
- Scrolling up/down using hardware buttons: problem here is that the hardware keys cause a jump to the next link. Scrolling or better yet page up/page down would be much more convenient. Does anybody really want to navigate to the next link with a hardware key?
- Scrolling up/down/left/right using fingers and touch screen: Every second or third time I use the touch screen to scroll the web page I will hit a link by accident. Couldn’t this be avoided if the N800 would not accept click events (or whatever they are called) from the touch screen during and right after scroll events?


There are a lot of things that the N800 gets right but I would have thought that – being called internet tablet – browsing would be among them. I bought the tablet for surfing but I am keeping it for the features listed below:

- vagalume last.fm client – cannot do without anymore
- VNC remote server administration
- internet radio in general
- games (Lucasarts)
- UPnP client for music


I am looking forward to your thoughts and comments.

Cheers,
fiy
 
Posts: 5,795 | Thanked: 3,151 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Agoura Hills Calif
#2
"- Scrolling up/down/left/right using fingers and touch screen: Every second or third time I use the touch screen to scroll the web page I will hit a link by accident. Couldn’t this be avoided if the N800 would not accept click events (or whatever they are called) from the touch screen during and right after scroll events?"

Amen. I can't count the number of times that I have thought, while using my N800, "The Internet is a MINEFIELD" because of how many times I hit unintended links while using it.

In particular, for some reason I have seen the NY Times definition of the difficult word "inside" about 500 times, since apparently its dictonary definition is easily activated.

I don't know if the solution you mention is as easy as it sounds, however.

But I think the N800 + OS2008 is a great combination anyway, even as a web browser.
 
akd's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 32 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ somewhere in the far south
#3
AFAIK the OS2008 will brings a most finger friendly scrolling on browser. No personal experience, still stick with OS2007, waiting for OS2008 final release.
 
Posts: 428 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Washington DC
#4
The internet is a minefield of links...I've heavily relied on the d-pad to browse. This all changed when I got my iPhone...I thought I'd miss the dpad with that but somehow Apple's programmers seem to know what to do if you mash your finger on the screen to either hit a link or to scroll.

I wish someone developing microB would figure this out, otherwise, I'm sticking with the dpad (which is also a reason that allure of the n810 faded after I realized I had to always have the keyboard out to surf and why I ended up picking up a n800 for cheap)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to phi For This Useful Post:
Posts: 50 | Thanked: 6 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#5
I agree with all the above quotes: the internet browser on the tablet needs to be greatly improved, especially in the easy of scrolling/panning and the distinguishing between scrolling/panning and click/text input events.

Nokia should take every programmer not working on the core Maemo operating system and put them working on improving and perfecting the browser.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#6
Originally Posted by fiy View Post
speed
These sites aren't particularly snappy on my dual-processor G5, so I'm not sure why you expect them to run like silk on your handheld. ITT is a bit of a special case, as the latest theme seems to be designed with zero efficiency in mind. Hopefully we'll see some improvements with further revisions from Reggie.

Originally Posted by fiy View Post
zoom
Zoom tends to do weird stuff with a lot of the AJAX-y multi-line text-entry areas. This feature will probably improve a lot over the next couple of MicroB releases.

Originally Posted by fiy View Post
full screen browsing concept
I'd hardly call fullscreen browsing "mandatory", I spend a lot of my time browsing in windowed mode. Hiding the toolbar isn't particularly necessary, either, as the horizontal dimension (the most important dimension) isn't affected by it. Though, perhaps a show/hide hot-corner/button sort of deal wouldn't be entirely unwelcome.

Originally Posted by fiy View Post
Scrolling up/down using hardware buttons
Both MicroB and Opera have easy workarounds for getting the d-pad set up for page-up/down. If you're so lazy as to not want to do that, holding the d-pad will get you line-by-line scrolling.

Originally Posted by fiy View Post
Scrolling up/down/left/right using fingers and touch screen
Just focus on the whitespace. There's a lot of it these days, and it's not that hard to hit.

Originally Posted by phi View Post
This all changed when I got my iPhone...I thought I'd miss the dpad with that but somehow Apple's programmers seem to know what to do if you mash your finger on the screen to either hit a link or to scroll.
This has a lot to do with the fact that Apple doesn't have to worry about two types of touchscreen input (thumb and stylus), they have no contextual menu tap'n'hold to worry about, and that there's no text-selection process to worry about (that, and they don't have to deal with the N800's noisy touchscreen and its weird input drivers). The issue is more complicated than you think, and has its roots in system-level stuff that MicroB (well, the browser UI) really doesn't have much control over.

Yes, it's not perfect, but it's not an entirely clear-cut issue either.

Last edited by GeneralAntilles; 2007-12-10 at 16:04.
 
Posts: 428 | Thanked: 54 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Washington DC
#7
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
This has a lot to do with the fact that Apple doesn't have to worry about two types of touchscreen input (thumb and stylus), they have no contextual menu tap'n'hold to worry about, and that there's no text-selection process to worry about (that, and they don't have to deal with the N800's noisy touchscreen and its weird input drivers). The issue is more complicated than you think, and has its roots in system-level stuff that MicroB (well, the browser UI) really doesn't have much control over.
Right, but Nokia has been going towards finger input and less of stylus...they should've dropped the stylus input altogether and focused on thumb/finger inputs. They obviously don't care about the stylus that much since they haven't put any effort to polish up the handwriting recognition on the platform. So choose one, and go with it.
 
Posts: 5 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#8
Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
These sites aren't particularly snappy on my dual-processor G5, so I'm not sure why you expect them to run like silk on your handheld.
I don't expect them to run smoothly but I expect them to run with acceptable speed for me to conclude that checking my Yahoo mail account is a tablet feature I can use comfortably. I do realise that the performance is low because the processor is relatively slow and that the processor was chosen for its low power consumption and low heat generation and all the other characteristics required for a small, light-weight device, but should that knowledge lead to a different evaluation of the browsing performance?

Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Both MicroB and Opera have easy workarounds for getting the d-pad set up for page-up/down. If you're so lazy as to not want to do that, holding the d-pad will get you line-by-line scrolling.
Nothing to do with laziness, I assure you, thanks for insinuating. I had seen a thread which mentioned the page up/down modification but I had understood it to be a global change effective on operating system level. I'll take another look at the thread, maybe I got it wrong.


Originally Posted by GeneralAntilles View Post
Yes, it's not perfect, but it's not an entirely clear-cut issue either.
Obviously not clear-cut since there are more than enough board members quite satisfied with the browsing experience. As for me, I'll use the mobile-specific sites of yahoo and google or try some of the dedicated proxies mentioned in another thread.

fiy
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#9
Originally Posted by fiy View Post
Nothing to do with laziness, I assure you, thanks for insinuating.
You misunderstood, my point was not that you were too lazy to make these changes (I assumed, correctly, that you were unaware of them), but that if you didn't want to make the changes, then holding down the d-pad to scroll is another option available to you (again, I assumed that you might've over-looked it, as many others have).
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#10
Originally Posted by phi View Post
Right, but Nokia has been going towards finger input and less of stylus...they should've dropped the stylus input altogether and focused on thumb/finger inputs. They obviously don't care about the stylus that much since they haven't put any effort to polish up the handwriting recognition on the platform. So choose one, and go with it.
Dropping stylus input would hardly be possible with the current maemo GUI. It would require an overall several orders of magnitude greater than the change between OS2005 and OS2008. Personally, I don't have any problem with stylus input and at the pixel densities the NITs have, global thumb-input doesn't really make all that much sense.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:10.