|
2007-12-31
, 01:17
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#2
|
|
2007-12-31
, 01:18
|
Posts: 164 |
Thanked: 132 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#3
|
|
2007-12-31
, 01:36
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#4
|
|
2007-12-31
, 09:38
|
Posts: 190 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Sep 2006
|
#5
|
|
2007-12-31
, 09:47
|
|
Posts: 1,012 |
Thanked: 817 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ France
|
#6
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Khertan For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2007-12-31
, 14:11
|
Posts: 529 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#7
|
That won't do, unless you are connected to some other source of speed measurements - without a fix, you don't know your speed, so you'd never exit that mode...
Besides, a "fail on foot or in traffic jams" mode is not really desirable, decent static control would have to integrate fixes to a better average, or use other data (like motion sensors or position relative to cellular transmitters) to correct the GPS fixes.
disabling/enabling Static Control in gps navigation,
interfering with gps receiver sensivity set by a manufacturer.
Do you think it's still safe to have third party applications to modify Sirf III sensivity in gps car navigation systems ?
Setting gps receiver sensivity against minimal velocity ?
http://www.gpspassion.com/download/APLSIRF-0-0-0-2.zip
http://www.memory-map.com/MMSirfSetup.exe
Darius