![]() |
2008-01-02
, 06:43
|
Posts: 164 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#2
|
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 10:42
|
Posts: 62 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#3
|
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 16:00
|
|
Posts: 538 |
Thanked: 168 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Seattle
|
#4
|
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 18:12
|
Posts: 348 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#5
|
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 19:59
|
|
Posts: 102 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#6
|
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 22:54
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#7
|
I agree about the worth of the GVM. I abandoned it after a week or so of use. It just isn't very useful. Most of my Palm apps won't run under it, the screen is too small, and the syncing just isn't there. It's a nice idea, but poorly executed. Perhaps later versions will be better, but this beta version isn't ready for prime time.
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 22:59
|
Posts: 130 |
Thanked: 13 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#8
|
![]() |
2008-01-02
, 23:13
|
Posts: 164 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#9
|
There is a flaw in the naming scheme for the GVM - I guess Access thought that naming the different versions by device would be less confusing than naming them by operating system. They were wrong, IMHO. Anyone & everyone who is running OS2008 should be installing GVM for the N810. Anyone who is running OS2007 should use GVM for the N800.
![]() |
2008-01-03
, 01:18
|
Posts: 348 |
Thanked: 61 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#10
|
I am very new here and really have read the threads for newbies. Guess thats where I came up with confliction views and would appreciate it if someone would give me the bottom line. My new N800 will hopefully have 2008 on it and I am wondering which version of palm GVM should I use, the one for the 800 or the one for the 810? I seem to read conflicting messages, and need to know the true answer here from someone who knows