|
2008-02-14
, 15:38
|
|
Posts: 2,853 |
Thanked: 968 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#2
|
|
2008-02-14
, 16:23
|
|
Posts: 1,076 |
Thanked: 176 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#3
|
|
2008-02-14
, 18:11
|
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Hafnia
|
#4
|
|
2008-02-14
, 18:57
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#5
|
|
2008-02-14
, 19:25
|
Posts: 5,335 |
Thanked: 8,187 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Pennsylvania, USA
|
#6
|
Wonder why these a-ole companies dont just develop some new standardize battery formats..
|
2008-02-15
, 02:04
|
|
Posts: 643 |
Thanked: 628 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Seattle (or thereabouts)
|
#7
|
|
2008-02-15
, 06:22
|
Posts: 18 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Alberta, Canada
|
#8
|
|
2008-02-15
, 11:30
|
Posts: 3,841 |
Thanked: 1,079 times |
Joined on Nov 2006
|
#9
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TA-t3 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-02-15
, 16:55
|
Posts: 39 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#10
|
futures: Probably because:
1) Companies can make loads of profit selling their proprietary batteries -and-
2) because it's a heck of a lot easier to make something that's the size and shape they want, when they control the size and shape of all the components including the battery. This is especially true with handhelds and phones where a couple mm is the difference between something being "thin" or "thick"
/me dreams of little radio-isotope batteries that give 20 years of runtime
-John
It states 1800mAh, have anyone tried this?
Last edited by whc; 2008-02-14 at 14:53.