|
2008-04-12
, 02:30
|
|
Posts: 296 |
Thanked: 80 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#2
|
|
2008-04-12
, 02:44
|
Posts: 1,950 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Seattle, USA
|
#3
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GeraldKo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-04-12
, 17:08
|
Posts: 186 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#4
|
|
2008-04-12
, 17:22
|
Posts: 1,950 |
Thanked: 1,174 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Seattle, USA
|
#5
|
|
2008-04-12
, 17:40
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#6
|
|
2008-04-12
, 18:20
|
Posts: 186 |
Thanked: 56 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#7
|
|
2008-04-12
, 18:30
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#8
|
The natural solution, allowing me to do things properly (which is where I have my stuff in home, not on some arbitrary disk), would be what I have all my desktop systems set up as: Home folder in a different disk / partition, with rootfs mounting that drive as /home (or, alternately, creating a symlink for /home to wherever that disk is mounted).
Okay, looks like that should be relatively easy with the terminal (please tell me it's running a decent file system!), but I am still a tad concerned:
Why was this not done out of the box? Is there a particular risk involved?
Has anyone else done this?