![]() |
2008-04-17
, 18:57
|
Posts: 364 |
Thanked: 54 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#2
|
![]() |
2008-04-17
, 19:04
|
Posts: 11 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#3
|
![]() |
2008-04-17
, 19:06
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#4
|
![]() |
2008-04-17
, 19:31
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 14 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#5
|
![]() |
2008-04-17
, 23:40
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#6
|
![]() |
2008-04-17
, 23:42
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#7
|
![]() |
2008-04-17
, 23:54
|
|
Posts: 228 |
Thanked: 30 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ Ontario & Iceland
|
#8
|
By Glenn Fleishman
Russian regulator requires registration: The folks at the Rossvyazokhrankultura (Russian Mass Media, Communications and Cultural Protection Service) have decided that every device with Wi-Fi inside requires registration for use by an individual user without a transferrable license, according to The Other Russia, which picked the story up from Russian-language site Fontanka.ru.
While Wi-Fi wasn’t as broadly unlicensed in Russia as it is in most other industrialized nations, a state regulator exempted indoor use in certain bands from registration. The Mass Media agency apparently believes that it has the authority to compel this, although there’s some doubt by observers as to whether it really falls in their purview.
Setting up a home Wi-Fi network or a hotspot would require what sounds like vast amounts of paperwork, akin to putting a cell tower.
~ ~ ~ ~
(Are they serious, as usual??)