Reply
Thread Tools
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#1
Given the recent rants about Maemo not being 'open' enough... and seeing the buzz about Android now... I only want to remind you that Android comes with strings attached, too.

It's great to see how it runs on tablets (because it actually shows how versatile the tablets are), but for those who care about freedom, I recommend reading this section on wikipedia as a start.

It's not all black and white and of course Android is moving the industry in the right direction (as maemo does). I only want to point out that, in terms of freedom and openness, it's not the knight in shining armor some of you seem to think it is. Based largely on non-copyleft licenses and backed by a shady company like Google, it doesn't make me jump on the bandwagon too eagerly.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to benny1967 For This Useful Post:
tso's Avatar
Posts: 4,783 | Thanked: 1,253 times | Joined on Aug 2007 @ norway
#2
im guessing that one big thing here is that google will not be selling any phones, as such they have to make sure their adds get seen. to do that they need to play nice with the operators, at least in usa, as they have a habit of slapping their own branding on the firmware.

still, i sometimes wonder if some take this open/free stuff a bit far. it seems some are angry at openmoko for going partially qtopia. this introduce qt onto the platform, and some seem to react like a vampire vs garlic...
 
Posts: 223 | Thanked: 38 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ home
#3
From what I understand, portions of Android are closed. for now. (mostly the backend Assembly/C code)

But as soon as the first devices start shipping, Google is supposed to release everything. Keep in mind that the SDK is not yet in its final version, nor has much attention been given expressly at security.
 
brontide's Avatar
Posts: 868 | Thanked: 474 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Capital District, NY, USA
#4
Google has committed to releasing the whole OS and SDK under the apache or GPL. I don't see the problem here.
 
Posts: 4 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#5
I'm curious to see which of Google's apps (if any) will be open sourced.
 
benny1967's Avatar
Posts: 3,790 | Thanked: 5,718 times | Joined on Mar 2006 @ Vienna, Austria
#6
Originally Posted by brontide View Post
Google has committed to releasing the whole OS and SDK under the apache or GPL. I don't see the problem here.
If it's GPL, it's fine. Apache is not a copyleft-license. From what I understand, they plan to prefer Apache.
 
Posts: 4 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#7
Only parts of it (like the kernel) will be GPL. The rest will be Apache. The phone manufacturers, OEM's and the other companies in OHA would have never accepted GPL. Google has already stated this.
 
GeneralAntilles's Avatar
Posts: 5,478 | Thanked: 5,222 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ St. Petersburg, FL
#8
Originally Posted by jzencovich View Post
But as soon as the first devices start shipping, Google is supposed to release everything.
Yes, well, we can talk when they actually ship a device. For now, it's really only so much hot air.
 
memson's Avatar
Posts: 75 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Dec 2007 @ UK
#9
I was speaking to JBQ (Jean-Baptiste Queru ex-Be Inc engineer) on his blog. I was hoping to pimp the idea of the N8x0 to him (read the linked blog post below) as his wife Eugenia (ex-OSNews editor) has an N800 and an N810. But... well.. he gave a few reasons as to why it's not going to happen. Also, look at the legalities he raised. Are we all sure we are complying with the Android license? He implied we are not.

http://jbq.livejournal.com/151129.html
 

The Following User Says Thank You to memson For This Useful Post:
Posts: 4 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#10
Probably when the full source code will be released, there won't be any legal issues with running it on the tablets. GPL and Apache both allow you to do this.
 
Reply

Tags
android


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:33.