|
2006-12-10
, 04:48
|
|
Posts: 305 |
Thanked: 154 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
@ Colorado
|
#2
|
|
2006-12-10
, 04:52
|
|
Posts: 128 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ Philadelphia, PA
|
#3
|
|
2006-12-10
, 12:06
|
|
Posts: 3,790 |
Thanked: 5,718 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ Vienna, Austria
|
#4
|
|
2006-12-10
, 12:46
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2006
@ Rochester, NY
|
#5
|
I'm not sure. Actually I don't need most of the new features (webcam? what for?). Of course, if it's faster and/or has more memory, it would be nice, but I'm quite content with what the 770 offers now.
The real no-no with the "870" is its design: too big, too silver, too retro, too many moving parts (cam, stand), and no metal slide-on cover. Also, it seems the buttons I use most (the ones on top) are smaller and harder to use because they're not separate any longer.
|
2006-12-10
, 13:26
|
Posts: 225 |
Thanked: 68 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
|
#6
|
I'm not sure. Actually I don't need most of the new features (webcam? what for?). .......
The real no-no with the "870" is its design: too big, too silver, too retro, too many moving parts (cam, stand), and no metal slide-on cover. Also, it seems the buttons I use most (the ones on top) are smaller and harder to use because they're not separate any longer.
|
2006-12-11
, 01:23
|
|
Posts: 832 |
Thanked: 75 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Phoenix, AZ
|
#7
|
|
2006-12-11
, 02:05
|
|
Posts: 25 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2006
@ Rochester, NY
|
#8
|
Did you even have to ASK?
|
2006-12-11
, 03:56
|
|
Posts: 1,245 |
Thanked: 421 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#9
|
Bromo33333
Rochester, NY
=======================================
Te de aliis, quam alios de te suaviust fieri doctos