Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
ArnimS's Avatar
Posts: 1,107 | Thanked: 720 times | Joined on Mar 2007 @ Germany
#1
I see a number of package submitters are not including desktop icons in early ports and applications.

This is actually useful! Omitting it gives the app an 'unfinished' look, and this can serve as a warning to testers if you feel your app or port should be run with caution (not just installed with caution),

Perhaps the idea could be expanded to a set of generic icons to indicate other testing/QA issues for the user/tester to be aware-of before launching application? It might more trouble than it is worth though.

"Just planting seeds... If they take root, i dunno." - Bill Hicks
__________________
find . -name \*.mp3 -exec mplayer -quiet -shuffle "{}" +
das ist your media player, and yuu vill like it
 

The Following User Says Thank You to ArnimS For This Useful Post:
ndi's Avatar
Posts: 2,050 | Thanked: 1,425 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Bucharest
#2
Agreed. Still, if I had to choose I'd much rather push for optification and lower dependency than icons.
__________________
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.

Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.
 
Reply

Tags
destop icon, testing apps


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16.