|
2010-01-15
, 04:04
|
Posts: 716 |
Thanked: 303 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Sheffield, UK
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Alex Atkin UK For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-15
, 04:14
|
|
Posts: 232 |
Thanked: 102 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Warren, MI, USA
|
#3
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pagesix1536 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-15
, 04:17
|
|
Posts: 1,217 |
Thanked: 446 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Bedfordshire, UK
|
#4
|
|
2010-01-15
, 04:23
|
Posts: 36 |
Thanked: 21 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ England
|
#5
|
|
2010-01-15
, 04:28
|
|
Posts: 739 |
Thanked: 242 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Montreal
|
#6
|
|
2010-01-15
, 04:37
|
Posts: 124 |
Thanked: 213 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#7
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Dak For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-01-15
, 04:57
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#8
|
|
2010-01-15
, 05:11
|
Posts: 71 |
Thanked: 12 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#9
|
|
2010-01-15
, 05:32
|
|
Posts: 501 |
Thanked: 292 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#10
|
Sure, it's a basic 640x480 webcam, but WTF is with all the pixellated garbage? Even cheap webcams from Staples look infinitely better than that!
Given the nice camera on the front, I'm presuming it's some sort of driver issue - surely the hardware can't be that crappy? Surely?
Does anyone have the benefit of concrete info on this issue? Can it be fixed? Will it?