Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 41 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1
Imo the camera on this is really poo. Is anyone else getting like blue streaks down their images?

And is there anyway to turn on some kind of image stabaliser because to get a crystal clear image im finding a real pain!

I came from a SE C902 and the cybershot on that i found was amazing, 10x better than the experience i'm having with my N900!

Sorry for the rant lol!

Here's a smile!

Thanks,
Wayne
 
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 84 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ bournemouth
#2
I aint getting blue streaks, but my pictures are generally very noise!!
 
maluka's Avatar
Posts: 741 | Thanked: 900 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Auckland NZ
#3
In my experience, any 5MP camera takes shitty pictures at night.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to maluka For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#4
In my experience, any camera without a tripod takes shitty pictures at night. But seriously, the OP is probably referring to the blue haze problem. As for noise, set ISO to 100 and boost exposure. You can make decent photos at night that way.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 
Posts: 21 | Thanked: 13 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#5
Originally Posted by maluka View Post
In my experience, any 5MP camera takes shitty pictures at night.
Or rather, any small-sensor, small aperture camera takes shitty pictures in low-light.

Megapixels is only a small part of the equation. Sensor pixel size and aperture are more important factors, since they directly affect how much light a given sensor pixel receives in a given amount of time, all else being equal.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to leek For This Useful Post:
Posts: 55 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ Reno
#6
the camera works fine for me

that was taken in the dark so i dont have any issuse with it
 
RevdKathy's Avatar
Posts: 2,173 | Thanked: 2,678 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Cornwall, UK
#7
You might like to see that other people have done pretty well with it.

There may be a problem with your camera - but my experience is that a lot can be improved by improving the operator skills. MY own photos have improved considerably.

The n900 doesn't have the fancy software of the SE phones (I had a c905 last) but the Zeiss lens is a big step up.
__________________
Hi! I'm Kathy and I'm a Maemo Greeter! Welcome.
Useful links for newcomers: New members say hello , New users start here, Community subforum, Beginners' wiki page, Maemo5 101, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Did you know Meego.com has forums too?
 
Posts: 41 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#8
Yea i think i'm refering to the blue haze. Just looks terrible lol! I'll post up a pic i've taken on here when i get home!
 
Posts: 446 | Thanked: 79 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#9
PICS ARE A JOKE ON THE N900 THE N95 TAKES SOME RESPECTABLE PICS BUT THIS THING IS PAINFUL TO WATCH.

if you want to show photos u took with the n9000 you better edit the contrast and brightness and hopefully that will be less embarrasing when people look at your camera pics

you can tweak and tweak all week till you cant speak and your n900 photos will stil be weak!!!!
this camera is trash and nokia wont lift a finger to change it cause it would be too expensive to come up with some kinda hardware change for every one who brought one
 
verumgero's Avatar
Posts: 221 | Thanked: 43 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Sendai, Japan
#10
So my wife is way into photography, me not so much, and it seems that she can take amazing pictures. But when I pick up her Nikon D200 I still take crap pictures. Sometimes it's what's behind the camera that determines the quality.

I don't have an n900 but I can only imagine that the camera is worlds better than my n800 or n810.
 
Reply

Tags
n900 is poo


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:33.