Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#1
Ultimately we're not going to be privy to all the facts behind the decision and why it is made, nor are we going to change it!

Nor are we going to change Nokia's mind whether or in what form the n900 will get MeeGo... If they didn't care would they be reading this forum???

I personally am happy to wait and am looking forward to an interesting future So far, Nokia have not let me down, and so far the track record with n900 love has been good IMO.

And for the rest of the non-n900 world, MeeGo can only be a good thing!

Here's to the future
 
Posts: 3,428 | Thanked: 2,856 times | Joined on Jul 2008
#2
Nothing..

So.. why did you make another one?
__________________
If I've helped you or you use any of my packages feel free to help me out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintaining:
pyRadio - Pandora Radio on your N900, N810 or N800!
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to fatalsaint For This Useful Post:
Posts: 94 | Thanked: 10 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#3
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
Nothing..

So.. why did you make another one?
Yup... A very good point you have there!

:shame:
 
Posts: 76 | Thanked: 33 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Portland, Or
#4
Originally Posted by fatalsaint View Post
Nothing..

So.. why did you make another one?
Took my reply.
 
ewan's Avatar
Posts: 445 | Thanked: 572 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Oxford
#5
I don't think they're necessarily going to achieve nothing. You're right that they're not going to change the decision itself, but there have already been people contemplating leaving the community over this, based mostly on some very out of date and no longer valid perceptions of what RPM based systems are like.

There's a lot of ignorance of each of the two major packaging systems from people who mostly only use one. If some of those gaps in knowledge can be filled in, fears put to rest, and real problems solved, we'll all be better off.

Talking about stuff is good.
 
penguinbait's Avatar
Posts: 3,096 | Thanked: 1,525 times | Joined on Jan 2006 @ Michigan, USA
#6
rpm rpM rPM RPM!!!
__________________
To all my Maemo friends. I will no longer be monitoring any of my threads here on a regular basis. I am no longer supporting anything I did under maemo at maemo.org. If you need some help with something you can reach me at tablethacker.com or www.facebook.com/penguinbait. I have disabled my PM's here, and removed myself from Council email and Community mailing list. There has been some fun times, see you around.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to penguinbait For This Useful Post:
qole's Avatar
Moderator | Posts: 7,109 | Thanked: 8,820 times | Joined on Oct 2007 @ Vancouver, BC, Canada
#7
So has your RPM shipped yet?

I called my RPM dealer's customer service, and I got "Sandra" on the line. She told me that Maemo is already using RPM packaging in the Freemantle release that runs on the N97 mini, so I don't know what the fuss is about.
__________________
qole.org --- twitter --- Easy Debian wiki page
Please don't send me a private message, post to the appropriate thread.
Thank you all for your donations!
 

The Following User Says Thank You to qole For This Useful Post:
Posts: 6 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#8
For me the switch will make me believe less in the future of Maemo. Maemo leaves Debian for Moblin. Maemo leaves the public for Intel. Yes it is strong symbolism and I think it is important that Nokia get it.

The debian tools and the strong link to Debian is for me of the key features of Maemo and it looks like many feels the same. Meego will be less..

Why will they do it?
 
Posts: 237 | Thanked: 157 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ San Diego, CA
#9
They might have an effect if:

Nokia was not aware of the potential downsides/backlash from the RPM switch.

AND

Nokia reads the threads and is made aware of the discontent, particularly from developers.

AND

Intel is willing to back down on wanting RPM



I'm a developer, and I dissapprove of the switch to RPM

Deb/Apt has *much* longer history on these classes of device, and broader existing platform support.

If RPM was the tradeoff to Intel to keep Qt as the toolkit of choice, I'd say it's woth it. But still a disappointing development. Better Qt/RPM than GTK/Deb
 
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#10
popcorn sales.

Oh wait-- was that a rhetorical question?
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post:
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:17.