|
2010-02-20
, 01:10
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#2
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-20
, 01:15
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#4
|
|
2010-02-20
, 01:15
|
Posts: 619 |
Thanked: 691 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#5
|
|
2010-02-20
, 01:17
|
|
Posts: 1,635 |
Thanked: 1,816 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Manchester, England
|
#6
|
|
2010-02-20
, 01:18
|
Posts: 4,556 |
Thanked: 1,624 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#7
|
Not make you fool for wasting your time and getting nothing in return. (having paid Nokia $500 to boot)
Any bugs found in Maemo, especially in the core will be very relevant to MeeGo since its supposedly Maemo6 based.
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Laughing Man For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-02-20
, 01:21
|
Posts: 12 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
|
#8
|
|
2010-02-20
, 01:21
|
Posts: 521 |
Thanked: 296 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#9
|
|
2010-02-20
, 01:22
|
Posts: 3,428 |
Thanked: 2,856 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
|
#10
|
Frankly regardless of what Nokia does, I think the price I paid for the N900 is well worth the money. As long as QT compatibility is kept across N900 and Meego (meaning I can run any QT based app in Meego on the N900 and vice versa).
Tags |
do you people, understand nothing? |
|
In summary:
Not only did we paid over $500 for the phone, but should we also provide Nokia with the following:
Help find and file bugs in Maemo, which helps Maemo improve, this giving Nokia invaluable FREE QA (includes the priviledge of paying for the device) and helps make the OS very solid
But if Nokia is not going to give firm answer on whether N900 is going to get MeeGo, why should we spend the time finding/filing bugs that may never get fixed on the N900. We *potentially* get nothing back on the N900 in return of free QA.