The Following User Says Thank You to GeraldKo For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-06
, 01:41
|
|
Posts: 346 |
Thanked: 139 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Houston Texas
|
#2
|
|
2010-08-06
, 02:15
|
|
Posts: 4,672 |
Thanked: 5,455 times |
Joined on Jul 2008
@ Springfield, MA, USA
|
#4
|
|
2010-08-06
, 02:56
|
Posts: 154 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Lima-Perú
|
#5
|
|
2010-08-06
, 09:28
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#7
|
|
2010-08-06
, 09:37
|
Posts: 5,795 |
Thanked: 3,151 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Agoura Hills Calif
|
#8
|
The Following User Says Thank You to geneven For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2010-08-06
, 15:20
|
Posts: 154 |
Thanked: 33 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Lima-Perú
|
#9
|
|
2010-08-06
, 15:31
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#10
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
Now, as for ROI, how much could it cost to implant a little silicone tip into the end of the standard plastic slot-fitting stylus? For that tiny cost, Nokia could have had a noticeably more ... what? ... elegant-feeling, dare I say sensuous, product.
(For that matter, I thought the N810 stylus was a step backwards from that provided with the N800; it was just too skinny. And I know, Nokia is probably heading toward stylus-free ... but if it still includes one, it ought to go for the superior tip.)