Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
xerxes2's Avatar
Posts: 513 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Sweden
#1
Anyone knows if plain Qt will look good on Meego or if QML is the only way to go? On Maemo plain Qt looks nice so just wondering if it would look as good in Meego or if that support will be dropped?
__________________
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).
 
Posts: 662 | Thanked: 653 times | Joined on Feb 2010
#2
What exactly do you mean "look good"? I believe that they'll function correctly.

Most QT applications will likely conform to the MeeGo handset UI guidelines (if developed specifically for it).
 
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#3
There is QML and libmeegotouch for plain C++. Please do never use desktop Qt widgets on a handset, it's just horrible (as was Gtk+). No serious developer should even consider such a thing.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to kanishou For This Useful Post:
xerxes2's Avatar
Posts: 513 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Sweden
#4
So plain Qt will not work as good on Meego as on Maemo? You're forced to use QML on Meego?
__________________
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).
 
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#5
I honestly don't know, but whatever you consider "good", is still horrible. There is really no reason to. Creating a custom mobile UI does not take that much time, and is absolutely necessary to create a usable application that people will take seriously.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to kanishou For This Useful Post:
xerxes2's Avatar
Posts: 513 | Thanked: 651 times | Joined on Feb 2011 @ Sweden
#6
Ok thanks. I've already written a Qt ui for my app, Panucci, but a little bird told me that plain Qt might look ugly on Meego. Sadly I don't got a N900 so I can't test it myself, will have to wait and see what happens.

Edit. If it looks ugly I guess I have to write it in QML even if i didn't plan to.
__________________
But the WM7 "horse" has a blood lineage tracing back to donkeys such as WM6.5, 6.1, 6.0, 5.1 that was fully neglected for too many years and Microsoft did sweet F all to maintain it (still running on Pocket IE4/6!!).

Last edited by xerxes2; 2011-06-06 at 15:17.
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#7
Originally Posted by xerxes2 View Post
Ok thanks. I've already written a Qt ui for my app, Panucci, but a little bird told me that plain Qt might look ugly on Meego. Sadly I don't got a N900 so I can't test it myself, will have to wait and see what happens.

Edit. If it looks ugly I guess I have to write it in QML even if i didn't plan to.
qtgui(widgets) is there..

And if I remember right mad-developer ui is plain qt(or maybe it is gtk) and yes it looks ugly. as people already stated you better go qtquick for UI you can ofcourse still use C++ for the rest of the stuff. so if you dont have very much UI you better convert UI to qtquick I dont think it will be that lhard for you and also it will be cooler

there is already some good ui components so you dont have to lmake buttons etc.. from scratch.

btw. another reason could be it will start faster cause the meegoui has already "loaded" qmldeclarative libs?
 
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#8
libmeegotouch and qtcomponents should be about equivalent, depending on whether you prefer C++ or QML.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to kanishou For This Useful Post:
Khertan's Avatar
Posts: 1,012 | Thanked: 817 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ France
#9
Originally Posted by kanishou View Post
There is QML and libmeegotouch for plain C++. Please do never use desktop Qt widgets on a handset, it's just horrible (as was Gtk+). No serious developer should even consider such a thing.
LOL !!! No serious developper should even consider QML, it s imature, bugged, and just good enought do display listview, image and rectangle at the Moment.

Try to do a text editor with syntax hiligthing in QML. Not possible ... at least with less than 10s between each modification on the text. It s not a problem with a QTextEdit

And Yes Real QT look ugly on MeeGo as it s not themed, and the existing one theme is bugged. So currently some say that Qt will not be themed, some they it will. But anyway they deprecated QWidget.

If dev want a to use javascript and css view, they can use WebRuntime, but forcing all dev to use Qml is pretty bad idea. Why switching to QML and not use Html5 with JS and a small loader. It ll really give us cross plateform apps contrary to QML.

// A Angry dev about another change i found stupid ... At least let QML Mature enough ... It s not useable today.

Last edited by Khertan; 2011-06-06 at 16:48.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Khertan For This Useful Post:
Posts: 341 | Thanked: 607 times | Joined on Dec 2008
#10
That's a pretty unfounded rant. You don't have to use QML, there is still libmeegotouch. Just don't use desktop components on a mobile phone, that's all I'm saying. Or go ahead and do so, if you don't mind that only a handful of geeks will enjoy your application (which may not be a problem, if you think about something requiring syntax highlighting...).

This has nothing to do with putting a pretty theme on it or not, it won't make a difference.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42.