![]() |
2015-05-21
, 15:44
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#2
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 19:36
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#3
|
Yeah, unfortunately, at least for Sailfish the idea of widgets (aka "live tiles" on WP) is remarkably unpopular for some reason.I brought this up a while back on TJC, but got shot down pretty hard...
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 20:07
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#4
|
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 20:23
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#5
|
Isn't a cover displaying 'live' information better than the limitations of 'live tiles' in WP?
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 20:32
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#6
|
For me, the issue is not in the details of how the minimized app is implemented (and yeah, I can imagine that WP does some crazy stuff), but more the simple existence of a flexible way to display multiple tasks on a single screen. There are some tasks that simply don't need to take up the whole screen to work; for these, it can be extremely convenient to park them all together in a single display.
In Sailfish, you cannot design an app to work with less than the full size of the screen. Instead, you get the chance to create an additional "cover" for the app, which may take up 1/4 or 1/9 of the screen, and may have one or two switches for I/O. Neither the user nor the designer can control the size or placement of these covers...
, and the user must keep the full-screen version of the app running at all times in order to maintain the existence of the cover. This just seems incredibly awkward if you actually wish to use the miniaturized interface for any serious work...
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 20:56
|
|
Posts: 6,453 |
Thanked: 20,983 times |
Joined on Sep 2012
@ UK
|
#7
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 21:00
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#8
|
MeeCast also has a "widget" that updates (almost) in real time. But a real widget does more than just passively display some information. A real widget offers full interaction. Not zero like the "widgets" you mention. No two actions like Jolla's covers. Full interaction. I hear there is a media control widget that offers more than two actions but I also hear it uses some unsupported patching and does not work for some users.
The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 21:16
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#9
|
You can't expect jolla to abandon multitask view
Gave you two examples of covers that update live, while being in low-usage state at the time.
The Following User Says Thank You to Copernicus For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
2015-05-21
, 21:17
|
Posts: 2,076 |
Thanked: 3,268 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
|
#10
|
But you can't really create an app that is just a cover. (And yeah, the cover UI is so limiting, there really isn't any point to doing something like that anyway...)
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: | ||
What do you think about it?
Last edited by itdoesntmatt; 2015-05-21 at 14:50.