Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
thoughtfix's Avatar
Posts: 832 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Phoenix, AZ
#1
Looks like they got hit by a bunch of edits/changes by people who don't know enough. The 770 page looks like it got swarmed by 770 haters - Really? Are six external references to negative reviews REALLY needed?

Anyone want to contribute? Be fair and maintain NPOV, naturally.

Wikipedia - Nokia N800
Wikipedia - Nokia 770
 
Posts: 503 | Thanked: 267 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Helsinki
#2
Originally Posted by thoughtfix View Post
Looks like they got hit by a bunch of edits/changes by people who don't know enough.
Thanks for reminding, looks like they will never stop adding wrong cpu frequency information for Nokia 770 (it actually runs at 252MHz and not 220MHz) Is there any way to prevent wrong information constantly sneaking in?
 
thoughtfix's Avatar
Posts: 832 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Phoenix, AZ
#3
Make an invisible comment in the tags above the line and/or cite sources
 
Posts: 503 | Thanked: 267 times | Joined on Jul 2006 @ Helsinki
#4
Originally Posted by thoughtfix View Post
Make an invisible comment in the tags above the line and/or cite sources
Well, there is no official source with the Nokia 770 cpu clock frequency information unfortunately We can only check '/proc/omap_clocks' on the device (type 'cat /proc/omap_clocks' in xterm) or run benchmarks which clearly show that cpu is faster than 220MHz. This is the fourth time I have corrected specs at wikipedia (always keeping a comment explaining the reason of that correction).
 
thoughtfix's Avatar
Posts: 832 | Thanked: 75 times | Joined on Dec 2005 @ Phoenix, AZ
#5
If you can publish the /proc data on a page somewhere, cite it as a reference.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:25.