Thread: N9 [Shipping]: It's finally here [for some]!
View Single Post
raghu_mark is offline raghu_mark
2011-06-22 , 04:01
Posts: 43 | Thanked: 71 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Bangalore
#483
Originally Posted by judibet View Post
Nokia is amazing!

Everybody want a N900's like phone, but:
- More slim
- Powerfull (with 2 CPU's)
- With a physical keyboard
- With N900's functions!

So, the N9 is very design but... Have only the design in more!

Where is the keyboard?
Where is the F.M. transmitter?
Where is the IM integration on contacts?
Where is the full flash support?
Where is the second CPU, like all new phones?

For me, Nokia is norrow minded !
Maybe most people will like the N9 but all Linux fans and N900's fan will prefer Android...

Thanks to Nokia for this amazing very very bad trip !

Krpeuh!
I have been reading quite a bit of aggression against the N9. Some are valid and some are not ...

1. Single core processor: Honestly N9 doesn't need a dual / quad core to work smoothly. It provides better performance than some of the dual core counterparts

2. HW Keyboard: It is true that HWKb would have made it a great device. But, i hardly miss it. I have missed it only on a very occasions.

3. FMRx and FMTx hardware is present on the Soc. Its a question of writing an app to use them. It was a similar case on N900 wrt to FMRx.

4. Regarding IM integration, you need to use the device to understand the kind of integration that has happened. Its Good and better than N900.

5. HDMI: i miss it as well. But, somebody could use NFC to try and stream videos over Wifi (wishful thinking )

N9 is not the logical successor to N900. But, it offers you nearly the same kind of freedom like the N900. Its a better device with complete Qt integration.

Honestly, you need to use the device before coming to conclusions
 

The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to raghu_mark For This Useful Post: