View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#104
Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
szopin, I still fail to see what is your exact problem with CSSU (leaving aside the fact that we stupid CSSU devs have not asked you how to organise updates). And please don't put words in my mouth next time ok?

BTW it will be very interesting when there is a community kernel(there will be) and .debs in question depend on it (as features, not just a simple .deb control file dependencies). How and where you will get support if something is not working?
Sorry if it seemed I was putting words in your mouth, not intended. My problem with CSSU is one of the first included bugfixes (libvte 'bugfix' which seems sloppy as it is a remap, though considering no bug report in 8 months, maybe too few people used xterm long enough to mention it in time, wasn't as thoroughly tested as portrait that's for sure), if you want to defend MAG's decision (I know he has 'saviour-like-status' here, but accepting everything he did without discussion seems cult-like) once you learn of its consequences, feel free. I find it unlucky, not thought through at the time.
Thumb2 sounds very tasty and I will probably install cssu when it gives 20% more rootspace and revert the libvte as too many packages at this point were compiled/maemo-fixed for the enter behaviour I have, to ask all the maintainers now to fork. Don't get my intentions wrong pls. I am more than happy that such great devs keep this thing alive, yet some(all) decisions should be discussable, if any question about them is equal to: 'stupid devs didn't ask you how to do that', that indicates something being wrong elsewhere (like your attack on the guy who wrote lock portrait/landscape mode - how dare you fork hildon desktop; yes, we all hate forks)
 

The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: