View Single Post
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#16
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
I asked someone once why they were gushing over adobe air when they could just use qt. The response was that most college students could create an adobe air app and make something shippable. QT on the other hand required people knowledgeable about C and that meant you now have to pay extra for their experience and knowledge when getting apps made.

The guy didn't mention quality once though. Just lowest price and quickest deadline.
That can be said of any modern framework. Qt doesn't always equate to quality products. In fact, I've been clamoring to find awesome Qt examples that make me a believer.

I'm still looking. Parts of VLC, Skype and WebOS were Qt. Great. But what I see are better C++ coders that used Qt better than the current crop of anything on the N9 or WeTab.

Qt Quick falls under the same category as Adobe AIR, unfortunately. Especially if you're using prebuilt components via Flex SDK and the like.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post: