Active Topics

 


Page 2 of 2 1 2
Reply
Thread Tools
MartinK is offline MartinK
2012-06-23 , 19:52
Posts: 1,548 | Thanked: 7,510 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Czech Republic
#11
Originally Posted by lma View Post
In fact that may be a bad omen for Blackberry. I mean, can you name one mobile platform that went with Qt (and there have been many) and lived to tell the tale?
Well, also a part of the WebOS 3.0 UI on the Hp Touchpad is written in Qt.

Still, I don't really think Qt is at fault there in this case. Rather outside interference & botched execution on the side of the ones using it.
__________________
modRana: a flexible GPS navigation system
Mieru: a flexible manga and comic book reader
Universal Components - a solution for native looking yet component set independent QML appliactions (QtQuick Controls 2 & Silica supported as backends)
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post:
gerbick
2012-06-23 , 21:01
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#12
Originally Posted by MartinK View Post
Still, I don't really think Qt is at fault there in this case. Rather outside interference & botched execution on the side of the ones using it.
Devil's advocate here... if it's botched execution, then why does everybody seem to get it wrong?
 
anonymous is offline anonymous
2012-06-23 , 21:41
Posts: 86 | Thanked: 164 times | Joined on Oct 2010
#13
I asked someone once why they were gushing over adobe air when they could just use qt. The response was that most college students could create an adobe air app and make something shippable. QT on the other hand required people knowledgeable about C and that meant you now have to pay extra for their experience and knowledge when getting apps made.

The guy didn't mention quality once though. Just lowest price and quickest deadline.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to anonymous For This Useful Post:
lma is offline lma
2012-06-23 , 21:46
Posts: 2,802 | Thanked: 4,491 times | Joined on Nov 2007
#14
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
The response was that most college students could create an adobe air app and make something shippable.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, sums up the sorry state of software engineering today.

QT on the other hand required people knowledgeable about C
If only...

The guy didn't mention quality once though. Just lowest price and quickest deadline.
Indeed, "shippable" != usable, or even fit for purpose.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to lma For This Useful Post:
MartinK is offline MartinK
2012-06-23 , 22:22
Posts: 1,548 | Thanked: 7,510 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Czech Republic
#15
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Devil's advocate here... if it's botched execution, then why does everybody seem to get it wrong?
To continue with the WebOS example - while the UI was built with Qt, it can't be used by third party applications. Thats as botched as it gets. Oh and no Python bindings.
__________________
modRana: a flexible GPS navigation system
Mieru: a flexible manga and comic book reader
Universal Components - a solution for native looking yet component set independent QML appliactions (QtQuick Controls 2 & Silica supported as backends)
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MartinK For This Useful Post:
gerbick
2012-06-24 , 00:06
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#16
Originally Posted by anonymous View Post
I asked someone once why they were gushing over adobe air when they could just use qt. The response was that most college students could create an adobe air app and make something shippable. QT on the other hand required people knowledgeable about C and that meant you now have to pay extra for their experience and knowledge when getting apps made.

The guy didn't mention quality once though. Just lowest price and quickest deadline.
That can be said of any modern framework. Qt doesn't always equate to quality products. In fact, I've been clamoring to find awesome Qt examples that make me a believer.

I'm still looking. Parts of VLC, Skype and WebOS were Qt. Great. But what I see are better C++ coders that used Qt better than the current crop of anything on the N9 or WeTab.

Qt Quick falls under the same category as Adobe AIR, unfortunately. Especially if you're using prebuilt components via Flex SDK and the like.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
balisingh is offline balisingh
2012-06-24 , 02:29
Posts: 278 | Thanked: 114 times | Joined on Jan 2010 @ SD, CA
#17
So, what, everyone should learn Javascript?

If a college student doesnt know C/C++ and hes writing software applications and not just some for the web, then that College's Computer Science division is surely making a fool of them.
__________________
Present: 950, N1
Past: 1520, Nexus 7, Lumia 720, 928, ICON AKA 929b, Asus Transformer, Nokia N9, Nokia n97, Nokia N810 Nokia E71 Nokia E62 Nokia 6102 Sanyo Ericsson Sony
 

The Following User Says Thank You to balisingh For This Useful Post:
gerbick
2012-06-24 , 03:13
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#18
Originally Posted by balisingh View Post
So, what, everyone should learn Javascript?

If a college student doesnt know C/C++ and hes writing software applications and not just some for the web, then that College's Computer Science division is surely making a fool of them.
No disrespect, but what school doesn't teach C/C++ now? Even when I got my education in the mid-90's, that was the standard. The rest I've picked up, I did so with a strong foundation in C.
 
panjgoori's Avatar
panjgoori is offline panjgoori
2012-06-24 , 07:08
Posts: 1,239 | Thanked: 1,278 times | Joined on Aug 2011 @ Balochistan
#19
there is a nice read at this website http://www.knowyourmobile.com/blog/1...s_analyst.html

i love the part when they analyst says Elop's days are numbered in Nokia.

Hope this becomes true and i really want to see that Elop is kicked out of the company.
 
Reply
Page 2 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top