View Single Post
Posts: 840 | Thanked: 823 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#2062
Originally Posted by Lumiaman View Post
The point is that we really don't know what was going on behind the curtains, and what numbers they truly had, read and acted upon. I suspect that the numbers were bad, and board approved Elop's burning platform. In retrospect, the burning platform letter was stupid, but he was following 101 business school class to align everyone in new direction, by telling the people where they were going. We can be armchair quarterbacks here, but we dont have all the info that made the board hire Elop and give him permission to burn the platform.
that's not what I read in that link at all. From what I gathered, it was trying to make some kind of point about a contradiction in somebody elses blog post, referring to the direction that sales numbers and revenue were going.