View Single Post
Posts: 359 | Thanked: 322 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#1113
Originally Posted by mikecomputing View Post
So what? Send a message to the lazy coders at those companys who does not provide support. Or realize facts that Sailfish small platform means less apps == not for those who want 100% support of all apps.

Btw. edited my post to make my point a bit more clear.
Simply calling up lazy devs and asking them to port apps to Sailfish OS will not work. That much has been shown time and time again. The goal should be to make the first Sailfish device as useful and as satisfying as possible. THIS MEANS QUALITY APP SUPPORT.

Gaining access to Android apps provides the results of millions of man-hours of development work and all the utility that comes with it. Can Sailfish afford to turn its back on that kind of value? Plus, motivated devs can still code in native Sailfish, should they choose.

What would be nice is if Jolla could figure a way to let the device owner configure the active cover's functions for those non-native apps. That, plus solid performance and custom swipe gestures to navigate and interact with apps, and I'd be very interested.
__________________
Hitting this thanks button will make you smile and feel good ----------------------------------------------------------------->