Reading the log, one thing some seem to lament is that since Jolla came on board, a lot of stuff has been hidden behind "it is confidential" smokescreen. Others elsewhere have been making the point that Jolla have moved from the likes of TMO to the likes of TJC to retain better control of what is discussed and how. Some seem to wonder if Nokia was more open than Jolla in the FOSS areas. Perhaps Jolla should start by being more transparent and engaging the community on the community's terms more. That's a first step in the quest for openness, of course. Sorting out FOSS issues regarding components etc. is another matter. Perhaps it could be transparently discussed first. Nobody is disputing Jolla's right to a business. Perhaps some components must remain closed. I guess people thinking this way are disagreeing with the way Jolla are approaching all that.