View Single Post
Posts: 68 | Thanked: 63 times | Joined on Sep 2008
#160
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
Are you only talking about capacitive touch screens? If so, than I agree with you and don't bother reading further. But if you are also talking about resistive touch screens, I couldn't disagree more.

I'm not sure if you were referring to me, but I'm the crazy person who suggested putting a touch pad on the back of a tablet that had a capacitive touch screen. I wouldn't suggest that for a tablet with a resistive touch screen, as I also would never use gnumeric the way you suggest on a tablet with a resistive touch screen. Why would I? I have a stylus and a resistive touch screen. I can pick up the tip and go precisely to a location.
Yes, I was referring to you. And I agree that this would work best with a capacitive screen and not a resistive one.

Originally Posted by daperl View Post
Relative cursor movement produced by a mouse or a touch pad is only necessary when your display dimensions are much larger than your tracking area.
In this I disagree with you. In most cases, yes, relative movement is unnecessary, especially if a stylus is available. However, if Nokia drops the support for a stylus, then relative cursor movement can provide much greater accuracy than a finger can, making it much easier to use apps like Gnumeric or Abiword.