View Single Post
Posts: 434 | Thanked: 325 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#165
Originally Posted by attila77 View Post
See ! While my post was primarily tongue-in-cheek (I hope people realized that at least at the Gross Community Product mention ), the bottom line is that different areas of the community are developing/changing at different paces, which will invariably lead to karma disrepancy after a while, even if we get the formulas right initially. Also, as we progress, sqrt will serve us less and less - because it will become clear even without looking that the high scorers will be those that are active in an area that is non-sqrt influenced.
I agree that this could probably be the most future proof system. Something like this:

karma = activityValue * (userActivity / totalActivity)

OK. Let me explain what I had in mind. Let's take products as an example (these numbers are all imaginary and have nothing to do with reality).

activityValue = 5000 (the amount of total karma given to products)
totalActivity = 400 (the total amount of starts for all the apps)
userActivity = 4 (1 app with 4 stars)

karma = 5000 * (4 / 400)

So according to this the karma for the user would be 50.

The great thing about this system is that it's really easy to tweak. All one has to do is to change the activityValue.

Anyway, I hope I made some sense here and I didn't do too many mistakes.
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sasler For This Useful Post: