Thread
:
Sprint task: Refine the karma system (community input requested)
View Single Post
attila77
2010-02-26 , 10:06
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#
174
Originally Posted by
qole
Yes, please. Let's get this fixed to the place where VDVsx is happy with the formulas.
Changing karma formulas before elections always feels a bit weird. I'd say use the original karma formula, and then after the elections the council can make it a topic and resolve it without the pressure of a short deadline, sense of potential injustice because of a formula change, etc, etc.
And I still thik a karma pool is a good idea to avoid issues like this on the long run
Think about it this way - the proposed formulas were discussed for weeks, and when a rough consensus seemed to form, it got implemented, and when the results came back, it still felt wrong. Do you see the problem ? Even an attempt takes months, that's why I feel the tweakster approach is a sisyphusian task...
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux -
The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of
PyQt
(
see introduction
and
docs
),
AppWatch
,
QuickBrownFox
, etc
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post:
ossipena
,
Texrat
attila77
View Public Profile
Send a private message to attila77
Find all posts by attila77