View Single Post
Posts: 3,664 | Thanked: 1,530 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ Hamilton, New Zealand
#84
Originally Posted by DuSStyBottoms22 View Post
If Nokia would refrain from putting out such crap prototypes and phones he wouldn't be giving them bad reviews and this wouldn't be an issue.

My opinion
Good reviews or bad reviews is not the problem here, the problem is the device being reviewed by that guy is an unreleased prototype model and it is not belonging to him. He is possessing Nokia's properties without Nokia acknowledgement and permission. He is still a thief. In my own opinion, anyone possessing something that isn't belonging to them legally is a thief. In this case he deserves it.
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to maxximuscool For This Useful Post: