View Single Post
Texrat's Avatar
Posts: 11,700 | Thanked: 10,045 times | Joined on Jun 2006 @ North Texas, USA
#59
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
When Android came to town...

Blackberry = Strong in enterprise, generally weak everywhere else.

Apple = Strong contender, but had serious issues with Job's 'deathgrip' (artificial limitations). Targets the top niche of the price range.

Symbian = Weak brand name. Lots of hidden (buried?) capabilities. It was 'sold with the phone', imho they're much less so (not really?) a contender in this respect.
Feh. Symbian is a stronger brand name than iOS. iOS was predicted to take it all. Android has gained more share in shorter time. Etc etc etc.

Throw all the disclaimers, contradictions or qualifiers you like, the point stands: 2 newcomers have shown the apple cart CAN be overturned (pun unintended). Ergo, the outright fatalism directed toward MeeGo is nuts. Let's wait until the body is dead before burying it, eh?

Originally Posted by ericsson View Post
I don't see any reason why MeeGo should be a great smartphone OS, at least not for some time when HW has evolved some more.
...and MeeGo is an OS for the mobile computing future, where Moore's Law is cheerfully ensuring we'll very soon have devices to fully exploit its potential.
__________________
Nokia Developer Champion
Different <> Wrong | Listen - Judgment = Progress | People + Trust = Success
My personal site: http://texrat.net

Last edited by Texrat; 2010-10-24 at 01:37.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: