View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#58
Originally Posted by danramos View Post
I can't say iOS is any better but by contrast, Android has seemed like the best of the bunch with far less closed source in Android than Maemo has ever had AND they listened to everybody that called for untying their Google closed-source proprietary applications from the operating system firmware images so that you can have a far more lighter OS and far, FAR more updates and bug fixes to the individual applications without waiting for a whole new operating system update (the way Nokia has decided to go with Maemo so far, pathetically).
A few notes - Android operates in a fundamentaly different way so these comparisons are apples and oranges. When you talk about the open Android, you forget the 'flavor', the things vendors (do not) put in. Just because something is Android based, that doesn't mean you would not have kernel driver issues, potential lack of source of it's Sense/Blur/YouNameIt interface, etc. Also, Google's cloud services seem to liberate them from open source expectations, as if something executing on a server makes the source irrelevant. Well, if I need to call a web service in blackbox fashion, it IS as bad as a binary blob (in fact, it's a bit worse, as at least the blob can't be taken away from me as easily). Thus the bottom line is you should be comparing generic Android with generic Linux, and (service backed) vendor implementations with other vendor implementations.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 

The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to attila77 For This Useful Post: