View Single Post
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 20 times | Joined on Sep 2010
#1494
Originally Posted by richwhite View Post
You're right and i absolutely agree, but 'simplified' or not, how exactly is what i said much different from what you said? Or, different from the truth? That Elop, trojan horse or not, got his job in Nokia and almost immediately set about aligning with the highest bidder?
Realize Elop's responsibility is not to Europeans, or MS hater, or Linux lover, it is to Nokia's share holder. Doesn't matter what he does, if he can keep a nokia's stock sustained growth for his tenure as head of Nokia, then he does his job.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to turbowei For This Useful Post: